• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Opal x T+ : F1 2007

mvervest

mvervest

New member
Opalfemale x T+ male , gives => => =>
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5751rs.jpg
    IMG_5751rs.jpg
    105.3 KB · Views: 212
  • IMG_5752rs.jpg
    IMG_5752rs.jpg
    104.3 KB · Views: 211
  • IMG_5753rs.jpg
    IMG_5753rs.jpg
    70.7 KB · Views: 210
  • IMG_5754rs.jpg
    IMG_5754rs.jpg
    103.8 KB · Views: 208
How is that different from an ultra?

And would the iris and pupil be so dark even in a T+ albino?

I'm the first to admit that both the Ultra gene and the "T+" are confusing to me, so I may be WAY off base, but...looks like an Ultra, inmy admittedly limited experience...
 
Ultramels were ORIGINALLY called "T+ albinos" by people that didn't know better. I suspect this is the same old mistake repeated again! Breeding it to an amel won't prove this is dominant because you should expect ultramels and amels if this IS an ultramel...or all ultramels if this is an ultra.
 
If it was Opal x Ultra, it would be an Ultramel, right?
(I get really confused over the whole Ultra thing for some reason, so please bare with me)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top