Interested
New member
from the research I have done, these are the same thing with different names. Is that correct?
Do you mean on the same locus of the same chromosome for a given species? In short, yes. At least that's how I understand it.Interested said:I have been trying to figure all this genetics stuff out. I have read through Serp Widgets tutorial, but I cant really figure something out.
Is the locus for Amel in the exact same place on every single chromosome for everysingle snake?
[COLOR=blue]ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP[/COLOR]
and
[COLOR=red]ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP[/COLOR]
[COLOR=blue]ABCDEFGH IJKLMNOP[/COLOR]
and
[COLOR=red]ABCDEFG HIJKLMNOP[/COLOR]
[COLOR=blue]ABCDEFGH[/COLOR][COLOR=red]HIJKLMNOP[/COLOR]
and
[COLOR=red]ABCDEFG[/COLOR][COLOR=blue]IJKLMNOP[/COLOR]
You're correct. It's something I've been wanting to include in an update I've been putting off for over a year. I had a few breeders tell me they use Hypo as a starting ground, but it seems like the most common way is just selective breeding.Darin Chappell said:I believe, and Serp will have to correct me, if this is wrong, but I believe that Serp wrote that definition some time ago, when there were more people talking about sunglows being an amel/hypo combo. There may be some of those double homozygous animals out there, but I think they are the minority by far.
Hypomelanistic is only a name applied because of the outward appearance. Whether or not it's redundant depends on the mechanism behind it.Interested said:I am wondering:
if amel is completely lacking black pigment(or melanin), then wouldn't it be redundant to say its hypo melanistic AND Amel? Maybe I am missing something?