• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

bloodred genetics

cfiscel

cfiscel

Dreamin' of Charleston
I thought I had read somewhere that bloodred is now considered codominant? Can anyone confirm or deny? Thanks.........chris
 
cfiscel said:
I thought I had read somewhere that bloodred is now considered codominant? Can anyone confirm or deny? Thanks.........chris
Click to expand...
It is variably codominant to the wild-type gene at the diffused locus.
 
Roy Munson said:
It is variably codominant to the wild-type gene at the diffused locus.
Click to expand...

:shrugs: What!! :shrugs:
This is way I'm going to be a "pet owner" for a while.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top