I think what you mangrove saw was a ruby freckled, not a ghost/bloodred. Are you asking what the babies would look like if you bred the f1 generation together? It would depend on what type of bloodred you had.
If you bred the a ghost and a regular bloodred together, you would get all normals het for hypo, anery a and bloodred in your first generation. If you bred the babies of them together you would get normals, anerys, ghosts, hypos, bloodreds, anery bloodreds, hypo bloodreds, and ghost bloodreds. I'm not sure what the ghost bloodreds would look like. I woul assume a less patterened and maybe lighter ghost.
Now if you bred a hypo bloodred and a ghost together, your first generation would be all hypos het for anery a and bloodred. If you were to breed those babies together, it wouldn't be too different. You would get hypos, ghosts, anery bloodreds and ghosts bloodreds. It depends on what you want to see the most.
To get a "candycane look" you would need to throw an amel gene in there, and to get any striping, the same thing applies. You would have to throw a striping gene. A candycane is also just a selectively bred trait of amel that has little to no orange in the background, leaving just the white (or as much white as possible) and its not possible to be het for candycane. You can breed a candy cane to a candy cane and get just normal amels. Just the luck of the draw. Bloodreds have a tendency to erase most of the striping as adults. You'll see it in a hatchling, but you may not see it for long.
OC-I would personally go with maybe a banded or motley ghost. I love how the motley just softens the colors a little more. Banded ghosts aren't something that you see too often, so that would be way cool, but thats just my opinion.