• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

HELP !! I.D. NEEDED ..??

Hi guys, i was wondering if someone could help me indentify "Mitch". She's just shed so her colour should be at it's best.. I've been given a couple of "maybe's" but wanted to know for sure!!
Here's some pics...
Just before she shed..
S1050157-1.jpg
[/IMG]
And just after she shed...
S1050174.jpg
[/IMG]
i'd imagine most of you guys will know at the blink of an eye so any help would be appreciated..
cheers guys..
 
He looks like a dark miami-phase, there is too much gray background for "normal, normal"... IMO. Yet it's still a normal, not really a morph. I have said this before, you can call it whatever you want, it's your snake..
Beautiful snake anyway!
 
Very nice normal, incidentally I have an almost identical female like that who this breeding season was proved to be Het Amel.

Ciao
 
I'm with Nanci and Pat on this one: that's a pretty, normal corn. :) By the most charitable Miami-phase description, she may qualify, but if she were mine I wouldn't be calling her one. I don't think she's a crimson (hypoA Miami-phase), and she doesn't have the kind of banding that a milksnake-phase would have.

If you call her a "classic", 99% of the corn enthusisasts out there will agree with you.
 
I'm with Nanci and Pat on this one: that's a pretty, normal corn. :) By the most charitable Miami-phase description, she may qualify, but if she were mine I wouldn't be calling her one. I don't think she's a crimson (hypoA Miami-phase), and she doesn't have the kind of banding that a milksnake-phase would have.

If you call her a "classic", 99% of the corn enthusisasts out there will agree with you.

Yeah...What he said!
 
Thanks for all the reply's, i think i'll go with the "CLASSIC" .. From what i can see on this forum, only a fool would disagree with Nanci and Roy !!
thanks again everyone..
 
Back
Top