Hi Don - nice to see you here!
Those are some real beauties! I sometimes take a look through your pricelist photos, but never looked through all the ones in the gallery until the previous post pointed them out.
Have you gotten to the point that you can breed two together that look like those photos and expect pretty near all of the babies to be anywhere near as spectacular as the parents? Or is it still only a percentage of "keepers" along with quite a few that are more ordinary? I'd like to talk to you about some from that line myself.
Rich is right about the naming of these various types. I have referred to mine as "hi-white" only because I have to call them something, but I don't want people to view them as a new morph, since I have no idea how long, if ever, it will take to reliably produce them regularly. People constantly ask me (and you, Rich, and other breeders too, I'm sure) if I have any of _???____ morph, which I may never have even heard of before. But until we ever get an "AKC" for herps, I guess it will just go on as it has, with public opion choosing what it wants, and being validated by appearing on lots of breeder's lists and publications. If it is not viewed as a valid or interesting morph by most hobbyists, and not picked up by many larger breeders, it will wither away. I am always open to discussions about names, as happened with the hypo "sunkiss(ed)t" okeetees. These forums seem like good places for that since they involve breeders and both new and experinced hobbyists.