antsterr
Always mostly awesome
I'm sure in a week or two I'll have a picture thread but I'd like some input to chew on right now.
Last year I bred together a normal female (het Amel, Caramel, Diffused) which I had produced 3 years before to fellow I picked up at an expo who was labled "het golddust diffused", so het amel OR ultra, caramel, and diffused. So I was quite happy to get out of that mix 4 caramels, 3 normals, 3 diffused and 2 ultramel diffused. I proved last year that he was indeed het ultra, not het amel. Or did I?
I kept one of those "ultramel diffused" as a hold back but this year with the exact same pairing I have some nice light ultramel-hypo looking fellows and what look like strait up amels coming out of the eggs. but but but.... how?
So I see four possibilities.
1. The father is not het ultra, but he and the mother are actually both het hypo and het amel and that the diffused one from last year is only a diffused hypo, not ultramel, and this year I'm getting both.
2. He is het ultra and some of the babies hatching just look more amel but are actually ultramel (they look amel but with a hint of grey, but as of this morning are still in their eggs, but look to have red eyes).
3. I mixed up my eggs/pairings and deserve a slap upside the head.
4. The father is actually ultramel, not, as I and the breeder I got him from believed, just a low black normal. Last year was just a fluke to not get any amels but this year I'm producing both (as one would expect from a het amel crossed with an ultramel).
So, I'm looking for someone in the know to explain what tells there are to distinguish ultramel from hypo. Also, can ultramel be so extreme at hatchling to look virtually amel?
I'll wait until they have their first shed and then I'll post an update then, any help in the mean time would be appreciated. My preoccupation with trying to solve this is today is killing me!
Last year I bred together a normal female (het Amel, Caramel, Diffused) which I had produced 3 years before to fellow I picked up at an expo who was labled "het golddust diffused", so het amel OR ultra, caramel, and diffused. So I was quite happy to get out of that mix 4 caramels, 3 normals, 3 diffused and 2 ultramel diffused. I proved last year that he was indeed het ultra, not het amel. Or did I?
I kept one of those "ultramel diffused" as a hold back but this year with the exact same pairing I have some nice light ultramel-hypo looking fellows and what look like strait up amels coming out of the eggs. but but but.... how?
So I see four possibilities.
1. The father is not het ultra, but he and the mother are actually both het hypo and het amel and that the diffused one from last year is only a diffused hypo, not ultramel, and this year I'm getting both.
2. He is het ultra and some of the babies hatching just look more amel but are actually ultramel (they look amel but with a hint of grey, but as of this morning are still in their eggs, but look to have red eyes).
3. I mixed up my eggs/pairings and deserve a slap upside the head.
4. The father is actually ultramel, not, as I and the breeder I got him from believed, just a low black normal. Last year was just a fluke to not get any amels but this year I'm producing both (as one would expect from a het amel crossed with an ultramel).
So, I'm looking for someone in the know to explain what tells there are to distinguish ultramel from hypo. Also, can ultramel be so extreme at hatchling to look virtually amel?
I'll wait until they have their first shed and then I'll post an update then, any help in the mean time would be appreciated. My preoccupation with trying to solve this is today is killing me!