Just for the sake of argument, let's assume (Yes, I know what happens when we do that) that an animal could be het for Miami (whatever that would mean). IF you take that into account, and IF the composition of crimson is simply broken down in an animal as being het for hypo and het for Miami, then my genetics wizard says that you should end up with something like:
25% Het. anery, Het. hypo,
25% Het. anery, Homozygous hypo,
25% Het. anery, Het. miami, Het. hypo,
25% Het. anery, Het. miami, Homozygous hypo,
Now, if we're not counting Miami as a gene that can be heterozygous (and I understand why we might not), then those percentages posted above in the other posts are completely accurate. However, I just thought it might be interesting to look at that Miami influence that may show up!
Darin