Kat
I'm talkin' to YOU.
Last summer Mike's Motleys was getting out of the business and had some highend adults for sale. I inquired about whether he had a hypo motley male, as I needed one for a project. He said he did, and at some point he called the snake a 'super hypo' motley (het butter). At the time, I assumed it was just a selectively-bred form of hypo, as indeed the hypo motley did not look like your average hypo... and, of course, because I'd inquired about a hypo moltey for a project, and he answered in the affirmative, I assumed that that hypo was compatable with plain ol' generic hypo A.... Anyway, I bought the snake, eventually wound up with it, though you can read about the shipping issue on the BOI if you care...
So I bred the 'super hypo' motley to my amber corn from Don... NO hypos. A clutch which should have been all hypos and ambers (and possibly amels and butters) hatched only normals and caramels (with an amel dead in egg).
Obviously 'super hypo' is not a variant of hypo A. The question is, what is it? Mike left me with the impression that he'd been in contact with Rich and atleast had showed him animals produced from the 'super hypo' strain... Does anyone know if 'super hypo' is recessive, or even if it's based off a single gene at all?
I showed Don a picture of the snake in question, and at first he thought it was amel... but I gave him a better pic of the eyes in comparison with some true amels, and he agreed that it was definitely different...
Here's the first pic, where he almost certainly looks like an amel...
So I bred the 'super hypo' motley to my amber corn from Don... NO hypos. A clutch which should have been all hypos and ambers (and possibly amels and butters) hatched only normals and caramels (with an amel dead in egg).
Obviously 'super hypo' is not a variant of hypo A. The question is, what is it? Mike left me with the impression that he'd been in contact with Rich and atleast had showed him animals produced from the 'super hypo' strain... Does anyone know if 'super hypo' is recessive, or even if it's based off a single gene at all?
I showed Don a picture of the snake in question, and at first he thought it was amel... but I gave him a better pic of the eyes in comparison with some true amels, and he agreed that it was definitely different...
Here's the first pic, where he almost certainly looks like an amel...