• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

What could this be

batmand

batmand

New member
CIMG0913.jpg

Is it just an ordenary amel motley or is it a sunglow?? It ha allmost no white in the rings..
 
batmand said:
Is it just an ordenary amel motley or is it a sunglow?? It ha allmost no white in the rings..
Click to expand...
Generally speaking, there are few, if any, amel mots that wouldn't fall into the "sunglow" classification.

I'm going with "sunglow mot" on that one.....as long as there are no belly checkers.

regards,
jazz
 
It's a pretty amel and appears to be motley, but a belly shot would be helpful. And as Dale said, most amel motleys seem to be sunglows. My amel motley is an exception though.


Jenn
 
I have a nice amel motley girl who has a few white specks here and there but she could fall into the sunglow category. It looks like a nice amel/sunglow mot to me, but belly shots are loved by all ;)

sunglows are amels anyways, so its all the same difference to me.
 
I don't really see the need for a belly shot (other than just for fun and because some member's like to see some more skin ;) ). There's nothing about that snake that makes me suspect it's not a motley.

Like other's have said, the sunglow thing is a toss-up. Personally, I prefer to reserve the name sunglow for selectively bred amels with reduced/no white. If it's not selectively bred, to me, it's an amel with a sunglow look.
 
Hi.. It is an motley, no belly checkers.. The only white is has around the rings is a few places and its allmost not to see..
 
zwyatt said:
I don't really see the need for a belly shot (other than just for fun and because some member's like to see some more skin ;) ). There's nothing about that snake that makes me suspect it's not a motley.

Like other's have said, the sunglow thing is a toss-up. Personally, I prefer to reserve the name sunglow for selectively bred amels with reduced/no white. If it's not selectively bred, to me, it's an amel with a sunglow look.
Click to expand...

When does the selectively bred amel become a sunglow then, if the starting animals had no white and shiny bright colors to start with? I've never heared before someone used the line bred factor in the sunglow definition :shrugs:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top