It amazes me that a moderator of this great forum can make comments that she did and still retain being a moderator. QUOTE]
I believe a moderator, in the job of moderator, has the duty to enforce the rules that the site owner has set. Any of the moderators also have the right to personal opinions which they can state to their hearts' content, as long as they also follow the rules Rich has set. They aren't required to be a moral guide, AFAIK.
I don't have time to see if this post was followed by a hundred bleeping pandas. Susan and I are at polar opposites of the political spectrum. I have family who are at least as ideologically different, and I don't confront them. Changing minds is exhausting work-- work that I've never volunteered to do. You all may think that modding fellow mods is some sworn duty that I'd be remiss in not performing, but I don't really give a crap about that. She didn't present her opinions as a mod. Lesser things have gone ignored. If some of you insist, here's an informal warning to Susan: try not to inflame your opposition with charged language. That should be good enough, since one of the two post reporters could have had his gluteals booted from here long ago if this was a less tolerant discussion board.
How much less fun would this BS be without real opposition? Would you go somewhere else for entertainment? Argue your points, and act like grown-ups. Cornsnake-board politics aren't going to change the world.