• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

big surprise in a clutch, HELP!!!

Original post by mactopa
now I think it don`t look like a pewter because of the color of eyes. in my opinion it looks more like an aneryblood.

Yup, agreed.

I am a little late on this thread, however, my initial thoughts did lean towards Granite when I viewed the original photographs.

The reason for this being that the Anery gene is more commonly associated with the Lavender than that of Charcoal.

However, there is always the possibility that the animal may be a triple combo (i.e. Anery Charcoal Bloodred) as the usual eye indicators are masked when the Anery + Charcoal are in the homozygous form.

b.t.w. excellent hatchlinhgs.

Regards. Lex
 
Yup, agreed.

I am a little late on this thread, however, my initial thoughts did lean towards Granite when I viewed the original photographs.

The reason for this being that the Anery gene is more commonly associated with the Lavender than that of Charcoal.

However, there is always the possibility that the animal may be a triple combo (i.e. Anery Charcoal Bloodred) as the usual eye indicators are masked when the Anery + Charcoal are in the homozygous form.

b.t.w. excellent hatchlinhgs.

Regards. Lex

anery and charcoal in the mix is unlikely because the the mother is blood het. anery hypo lav and the father is hypoblood het. anery lav. with one more gene het. is the result of clutch no longer accurate.

result of this clutch is:
2 bloods
5 (6) hypo bloods ((6) cause one was dead in the egg)
3 (4) lav bloods ???((4) cause one was dead in the egg)
2 hypo lav bloods
1 surprise
 
Too true........I did not refer to the results of this clutch before replying, rather finger happy with my response :twohammer

Regards. Lex
 
Wow that is one nice corn.. I see charcoal in the mix also,, Congrats!!


Yup, the male hatchling appears to be a Pewter.

The 'surprise' female (from Blood x Hypo Blood parentage) is a visual Granite, as is the 2nd female from a different pairing.

Original post by mactopa
here a little update from the mystery anery in the clutch and two mystery anery from the hypoblood het. lav x lavblood het. hypo


The confusion is because you have posted 2 clutch results in the same Thread & I accept that I have quickly read & responded in haste. It would appear that I am not the only person to misunderstand the up date though!:grin01:

Looks like the HypoBlood x LavBlood pairing have a Charcoal gene in there after all. :spinner:

Regards Lex
 
The confusion is because you have posted 2 clutch results in the same Thread & I accept that I have quickly read & responded in haste. It would appear that I am not the only person to misunderstand the up date though!:grin01:

Looks like the HypoBlood x LavBlood pairing have a Charcoal gene in there after all. :spinner:

Regards Lex

ok I see what do you mean ;)
here again the result of the clutch from
male - hypoblood het lav (anery) x female - blood het hypo lav (anery) is female 1

from male (same like the first pairing) - hypoblood het lav (anery) x female lavblood het. hypo (anery) is male and female 2 are boths two months younger like female 1 thats the reason why the color of their eyes are different.
at the beginning female 1 looked also like pewter for me.

female with one week
black6jw1.jpg
 
I would say there has to be some blood in there...It's got the "smeared " sides and rounder blood "eyebrows". Sweet, can't wait to see offspring.
 
ok I see what do you mean ;)
here again the result of the clutch from
male - hypoblood het lav (anery) x female - blood het hypo lav (anery) is female 1

from male (same like the first pairing) - hypoblood het lav (anery) x female lavblood het. hypo (anery) is male and female 2 are boths two months younger like female 1 thats the reason why the color of their eyes are different.
at the beginning female 1 looked also like pewter for me.

female with one week
black6jw1.jpg

Yes,

I am in complete agreement.

Female 1 looks very similar to a Pewter neonate at 1 week, but, she is in fact a Granite (as your up date provides).

Phew...........we got there in the end :grin01:

I shall let you reply to "ForkTung" :awcrap:

Lex
 
OOPS...After skimming through this thread and thinking one of the parents was ONLY het for blood I read it more thoroughly.

I accept that I have quickly read & responded in haste. It would appear that I am not the only person to misunderstand the up date though!

It's obvious the snake has to be some morph of blood. I made a mistake (I'm not sure if a pretentious snub was called for?) but, well, there it is...I made a mistake.
 
OOPS...After skimming through this thread and thinking one of the parents was ONLY het for blood I read it more thoroughly.



It's obvious the snake has to be some morph of blood. I made a mistake (I'm not sure if a pretentious snub was called for?) but, well, there it is...I made a mistake.

Nope, the original poster did not question the relevance of the Bloodred gene.

My comment was made in jest, I too made a mistake...........seems it was that kinda day!


Regards. Lex
 
Back
Top