Well, I do differ with this thought. I don't think because someone wants to call his or her snake something that it makes it that. For one, this only perpetuates the mislabeling that seems to be occurring with some types, especially the Okeetee and the various Amel varieties. If it is not what it is thought to be, it is just not.
And if I wanted to call my Anery a lavender, does that then make it a lavender? I know that Okeetee is just another form of normal and that lavender is a different gene altogether, but mislabeling is mislabeling. IF a seller sells their offspring as not what it is and the buyer learns that it is not what was said to be, does it make it correct for that person to then perpetuate that and sell it or offspring of it as the wrong labeled type?
I don't mean to be a pain on this but an Okeetee in the "non locale" sense is a specific 'look' just as the Miami and the Candy Cane and the Sunglow. If we just say that people can call their amels a Sunglow because someone sold it to them as such but it has white on it, that erodes the sense of having names for specific looks and the ability for people to purchase snakes for that "look."
My opinion is, let's try to leave specific names for the specific looks they are intended for.
This is just my .02 cents.
And I agree, I would call that nice normal a nice normal. I have a few NICE normals myself that aren't Okeetee but I enjoy them and love their looks. NOTHING wrong with a "normal" at all in my view.