Shiari
Blutterer
You aren't bringing up facts at all! I've said, repeatedly, that it's speculation about this clutch! It would be nifty if! It's an exciting experiment and possibility and just very interesting it only really showed up in the girls this time around! And you are coming in basically telling me that it's pointless, making false claims about temperature affecting sex (you have NO evidence!), and are literally on here only speculating about why it couldn't possibly be sex-linked. When, again, I've never declared it 100 percent is! There's a reason I'm going to be breeding him again next year and really keeping an eye on the clutches!
No zigzags next year? Hunh. What a strange occurrence in this one clutch.
Zigzags but only in the males next year? What on earth is going on, how interesting.
Zigzags but only in the females again? Hmmmmn... time to really start figuring this out.
Again, I'm not threatened by any supposed 'facts' you're bringing. They're either wrong (temp being linked to sex in corns) or don't apply to my animals (such as temperature variation affecting the pattern as the babies were not only from the top/bottom/middle but spread out). You are spouting opinions. And those opinions are so far only as to why it absolutely isn't possibly maybe sex linked.
I'm not threatened, I'm tired of seeing this pop up with replies only for those replies to be "but have you considered this NEW reason why your 'what if' is completely wrong?????"
No zigzags next year? Hunh. What a strange occurrence in this one clutch.
Zigzags but only in the males next year? What on earth is going on, how interesting.
Zigzags but only in the females again? Hmmmmn... time to really start figuring this out.
Again, I'm not threatened by any supposed 'facts' you're bringing. They're either wrong (temp being linked to sex in corns) or don't apply to my animals (such as temperature variation affecting the pattern as the babies were not only from the top/bottom/middle but spread out). You are spouting opinions. And those opinions are so far only as to why it absolutely isn't possibly maybe sex linked.
I'm not threatened, I'm tired of seeing this pop up with replies only for those replies to be "but have you considered this NEW reason why your 'what if' is completely wrong?????"