ForkedTung
Serpent Mound Monk
I'd humbly like to add that I believe that corns exhibit epistasis (when one gene affects the expression of a different gene), which contributes to confusion in predicting a consistent outcome for some of these phenotypic traits that aren't strictly Mendelian. Epistasis is different from dominance and recession; those terms apply to paired alleles that code for the same trait. When epistasis occurs, one gene masks or changes the expression of a different gene at a different locus. It seems to me that this may occur in some of these subtleties of color and/or pattern refinement, particularly in some of those can't-predict-it peachy, purple-y undertones that certain morphs sometimes develop, and which don't seem to follow a normal Mendelian inheritance pattern.
Very interesting Caryl, I would have to agree with your belief that epistasis could be controlling the variable outcomes. It is also my understanding that the "supressed gene", hypostatic, can be influenced by more than one other gene. As if the potential for complications wasn't enough.....
Then again, to paraphrase Kyle, maybe we just don't know enough about which genes code for what traits to realize it's ALL simply Mendelian. Aren't corn snake genetics fun?
Whose Kyle...lol