• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Stargazing

Wilko92

heart in the right place
Q: What is Stargazing?
A: It is a recessive gene that causes neurological problems in cornsnakes - it affects a cornsnake's sense of balance and coordination. It is also known simply as "SG". (Though the term "Stargazing" is also used to describe a snake's lack of balance or odd behaviour which is caused through genuine illness and not from the Stargazing gene)

Q: What are the signs of Stargazing?
A: Homo Stargazers (cornsnakes with 2 Stargazer genes) move fine on flat surfaces, but once they raise their head off the surface, they swing their heads about and move wildly. They may also lay with their head in the air looking up at nothing. If flipped onto their back it takes them a few moments to realise this and right themselves. They also have problems feeding as the more excited/agitated they become, the more uncoordinated their movements are. Otherwise these snakes are healthy and mentally fine - they still eat, shed and poo like any other cornsnake.
Het Stargazers will show no visible signs of carrying the Stargazing gene.

Q: Where did it come from?
A: It was first noted to crop up sporadically in an Okeetee line here and there and presumed to be incubational stress or something at first. It became apparent after some years of seeing these show up that the condition appeared to have a heritable cause. Review of the records did indeed show a definite pattern to certain individuals producing the effect, a pattern of recessive gene inheritance.
The Stargazing gene was really discovered in the year 2000 in America, in the first Sunkissed snakes. The breeder claimed that more than 50% of the Sunkissed carried the Stargazer gene.

Q: What morphs does it occur in?
Q: Through breedings back and forth with Sunkissed projects and Sunkissed snakes, Sunkissed has a higher chance of producing Stargazing snakes as the original gene pool for Sunkissed was quite small. But any snake with a Sunkissed decendant has a chance of carrying Stargazing, so Stargazing has spread to many other morphs. Without knowing the exact parentage of your snake, there is a chance of it being het Stargazing. Also, any snake from the original producer of Sunkissed snakes (Rich) has a high chance of being het Stargazer as he outcrossed a lot of his snakes.

Q: How can I find out if my corn snake is het Stargazing?
A: If you know your snake's pedigree, and read up on who was breeding what, you can estimate how likely it is for older snakes to be carrying Stargazing.
With snakes that you don't know the pedigree of (back to 2000), you'd have to breed your cornsnake with a Stargazing cornsnake. This may seem wrong, breeding FROM a Stargazing cornsnake, but Stargazers have a PAIR of Stargazing genes. This means you can be 100% sure that the clutch outcome (from a large clutch) proves that the cornsnake being bred to the Stargazer is clear or het Stargazer.
Here's a couple of punnet squares to explain this : "s" is 1 Stargazing gene and "S" is 1 normal gene.

Stargazer (ss) x Normal (SS)

.....s | s
S | Ss Ss
S | Ss Ss

Because all of the clutch is het Stargazer, none of them will show signs of Stargazer.

Stargazer (ss) x Het Stargazer (Ss)

.....s | s
S | SS SS
s | Ss Ss

50% of the clutch will be homo Stargazer, and so will show signs of being Stargazer. The odds are 50% per egg, so the chances are good that you would get Stargazers from a Homo Stargazer x Het Stargazer clutch.

A Het Stargazer (Ss) x Het Stargazer (Ss) clutch has much slimmer odds though ...

.....S | s
S | SS Ss
s | Ss ss

There's a 25% chance per egg of a homo Stargazer, so only a quarter of the clutch should be visual Stargazers. 50% chance of het Stargazer, and a 25% chance of Stargazer free snakes.

Q: What if I've already found Stargazers in a clutch?
A: This means both parents are het Stargazing.

Q: What happens to the offspring of testings?
A: When testing for Stargazing, there are several things that can be done with the offspring. Whole clutches can be killed, even if there is a chance of clean snakes. Stargazing snakes can kept in the collection to test breed with other snakes. Possible clear snakes can be kept to breed when they are mature enough, to prove that they are clear. This way the line can still continue - just without the Stargazing gene.
If offspring are sold on without informing the new owner of it's possible Stargazer status, it will continue to spread when these snakes are then bred from in future.

Q: Why is it important to get rid of Stargazing?
A: It's best for cornsnakes, and the hobby as a whole. Especially as it is proven to be a simple recessive gene, so it can be removed from the hobby with relative ease (compared to the neurological problems which occur in royal pythons and carpet pythons), if people are honest and open about this gene instead of ignoring it.
Several breeders are already in the processes of testing their lines to clear them of Stargazing, with some putting the priority on Sunkissed lines and Sunkissed projects. There is expected to be a premium on the cost of snakes from clean lines, to encourage people to keep them clean.

Hope this helps / is useful and informative :)
 
Did you write all that? or did you copy and past that? Just curious.

On stargazing, who cares. Feed off the ones that are stargazing. Simple as that. It does not hurt the animal in any way if it carries (het) the gene. So, as long as you are getting rid of and not selling the actual stargazers (homo), who cares.
 
Also, any snake from the original producer of Sunkissed snakes (Rich) has a high chance of being het Stargazer as he outcrossed a lot of his snakes.

An intentional attempt to slander the owner of this site? sure looks like it to me.
 
Did you write all that? or did you copy and past that? Just curious.

On stargazing, who cares. Feed off the ones that are stargazing. Simple as that. It does not hurt the animal in any way if it carries (het) the gene. So, as long as you are getting rid of and not selling the actual stargazers (homo), who cares.

I spent quite a while typing that, might have ended up borrowing a couple of phrasings and sentences from other sources though.

IMO, seeing as it's a recessive gene, why not make a little effort now to make sure homo Stargazers don't crop up? Bit of effort breeding it out and then you'd never have to worry about it.

I thought Kathy Love was the originator of the Sunkissed morph, not Rich....:shrugs:

Ah my bad, I was looking through a couple of websites for information and none of them were completely clear about who the originator was for the Sunkissed morph. I think Rich had one of the largest Sunkissed projects but Kathy originally discovered it. If I could I'd edit the post to "The Stargazing gene was really discovered in the year 2000 in America, in Sunkissed snakes. The breeder claimed that more than 50% of the Sunkissed carried the Stargazer gene"

An intentional attempt to slander the owner of this site? sure looks like it to me.

And no it was not.
 
It is a bit random but I just thought it'd be good to have some information on Stargazing in a thread, and hence why its a bit long as I tried to make it as accurate as I could. I read and re-read it several times before posting it, but inevitably I missed a couple of things and could have worded them differently.
I didn't post it to point fingers, (plus trying to slander the owner of the site seems a bit silly doesn't it?) I just posted it to inform people / new owners who didn't know about it.
 
Hey, Wilko, if you purchase an annual membership, you can edit your posts pretty much at will :). As well as the benefits to you (knowing you're doing something good for the site, the ability to edit, and to occasionally get contributing member discounts, as well as access to a contributing member forum area, here), you are also helping to support one of the best snake sites out there. And it only costs $25! Chump change, imho.
 
Since there is some mis-information about the origins of the Sunkissed morph, this is from Rich's SerpenCo site (2008 "edition"):

Sunkissed Corn Snake

These are based on the type 'B' Hypomelanism that Kathy Love came up with. It has also been recently determined that this hypomelanism is CUMULATIVE with the type 'A' Hypomelanism which can give you DOUBLE BRIGHT looking animals when they are homozygous for both Hypo genes. Presents some VERY interesting possibilities!!

These were originally marketed by Kathy Love as Hypomelanistic Okeetees years ago. Subsequent experimentation discovered that this line of Hypomelanism was incompatible with the "standard" Hypomelanism that we had previously been working with. Consequently, there was a bit of concern about the immense amount of confusion that could result by having two separate and distinct lines of "Hypomelanistic Okeetee" floating around in the marketplace that when bred together would produce only normal colored Okeetees, and not hypos. So this type "B" Hypomelanistic line was simply renamed to "Sunkissed".

To single out SerpenCo stock as having the greater possibility of being het stargazer is incorrect.
 
Since there is some mis-information about the origins of the Sunkissed morph, this is from Rich's SerpenCo site (2008 "edition"):

Thank you for the correct information :)

To single out SerpenCo stock as having the greater possibility of being het stargazer is incorrect.

I apologised earlier about the wording. I clearly need to re-write my original post, but I don't have the money spare to purchase an annual membership in order to do so. Would it be okay if I posted my revised Stargazing post after this comment, so it can be read over - and if acceptable, posted in a new thread so it could be sticky'd?
 
It is true that the first sunkissed arose out of my line of pure okeetees. The first stargazers were all sunkissed, although it turned out that like sunkissed, the stargazer gene was also in that okeetee line, and some okeetee babies were also stargazers.

Rich bought some sunkissed from me early on. I avoided breeding sunkissed into anything else for many years because I didn't want to spread the stargazer genes beyond the okeetee lines, and because I didn't want to mix hypo A and sunkissed for the confusion mentioned earlier. AFAIK, Rich was the first one to prove the 2 genes incompatible by breeding them together.

For a long time, I could guarantee that my non-okeetee lines were free of carrying stargazing, because I never (to this day) bred sunkissed into anything else. But over the years, I have added new blood to my various lines, and not all new purchases had many generations listed on the ACR to check pedigrees. AFAIK, my non-sunkissed purchases had no sunkissed in them. But there is no way to be sure anymore, unless you can trace the lineage back to before the time that sunkissed appeared, or unless you have test bred to a 'gazer or het.

There is a good thread and synopsis on stargazing over on the Source, too, if anyone wants to read it.

Hope that helps.
 
I dont think you need to post the same content again, and is a good contribution to the subject as is.

One member posted above if they are only het SG as opposed to homo gazers, it doesn't matter. I feel it DOES matter, as there are efforts to squash this gene from the genetic pool. Having a bad het run around can appear homo in a possibly unique, expensive animal, and that could be total loss.
 
Q: What is Stargazing?
A: It is a recessive gene that causes neurological problems in cornsnakes - it affects a cornsnake's sense of balance and coordination. It is also known simply as "SG". (Though the term "Stargazing" is also used to describe a snake's lack of balance or odd behaviour which is caused through genuine illness and not from the Stargazing gene).

Agreed, it is not a genuine illness.. It is still thought to be a mutant simple recessive gene..

Q: What are the signs of Stargazing?
A: Homo Stargazers (cornsnakes with 2 Stargazer genes) move fine on flat surfaces, but once they raise their head off the surface, they swing their heads about and move wildly. They may also lay with their head in the air looking up at nothing. If flipped onto their back it takes them a few moments to realise this and right themselves. They also have problems feeding as the more excited/agitated they become, the more uncoordinated their movements are. Otherwise these snakes are healthy and mentally fine - they still eat, shed and poo like any other cornsnake.
Het Stargazers will show no visible signs of carrying the Stargazing gene.

They move fine on flat surfaces? Negative, they move fine when they are not overly stimulated.. I also disagree that when their head is pointed up in the air they are not looking at anything, they do try to maintain their focus on what has caused them stimulation.. They do not take very long to upright themsleves when they are on their back, although they may choose to lay on their backs when they eat, in some sort of way they seem to be maintaining a sense of the task at hand not being concerned with laying on their backs.. Of course when they try to strike at prey items, they are relatively uncoordinated, due of course to their stimulation... The more a stargazer is excited the more "clumsey" it behaves, but they do and will constrict like most other corns, although they seem to be aware they might have to constrict a longer..

This is a first hand expieriance of raising to adult hood stargazers...
 
Thank you for the correct information :)



I apologised earlier about the wording. I clearly need to re-write my original post, but I don't have the money spare to purchase an annual membership in order to do so. Would it be okay if I posted my revised Stargazing post after this comment, so it can be read over - and if acceptable, posted in a new thread so it could be sticky'd?

Sounds like a plan to me!
 
Did you write all that? or did you copy and past that? Just curious.

On stargazing, who cares. Feed off the ones that are stargazing. Simple as that. It does not hurt the animal in any way if it carries (het) the gene. So, as long as you are getting rid of and not selling the actual stargazers (homo), who cares.
Did you come up with this ingenious idea all by yourself? You really only care about selling homo SG, but not het SG?

Is this the position that other breeders of Sunkissed support? Considering that all Sunkissed lines have a 50% chance of carrying the SG gene, it is surprising that nobody seems to be finding it, except those who are testing for it.

Are other breeders of Sunkissed following Mike‘s “who cares” position and covering up SG in their Sunkissed lines?
 
Did you come up with this ingenious idea all by yourself? You really only care about selling homo SG, but not het SG?

Is this the position that other breeders of Sunkissed support? Considering that all Sunkissed lines have a 50% chance of carrying the SG gene, it is surprising that nobody seems to be finding it, except those who are testing for it.

Are other breeders of Sunkissed following Mike‘s “who cares” position and covering up SG in their Sunkissed lines?

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=111064
 
Sounds like a plan to me!

First, could you explain to me why you say I am incorrect that SerpenCo stock has a higher chance of being het Stargazing?

Did you come up with this ingenious idea all by yourself? You really only care about selling homo SG, but not het SG?

Is this the position that other breeders of Sunkissed support? Considering that all Sunkissed lines have a 50% chance of carrying the SG gene, it is surprising that nobody seems to be finding it, except those who are testing for it.

Are other breeders of Sunkissed following Mike‘s “who cares” position and covering up SG in their Sunkissed lines?

Not all breeders of Sunkissed have the same attitude thankfully.
 
"First, could you explain to me why you say I am incorrect that SerpenCo stock has a higher chance of being het Stargazing?"

Because Rich bought his first sunkissed from me, a couple of pairs, as far as I remember. So he would have gotten the stargazer gene pretty much just like anyone else who ever bought sunkissed. And most people with sunkissed did breed them into several or more other morphs.

So how would any of that translate into his bloodlines having a heavier percentage than anyone else who ever bred sunkissed into other projects? I am not following the logic.

Somebody might think that I would have a higher percentage, since it originated with me. But that would not be true either, since I purposely avoided breeding into other lines (although now I have bought some lav sunkissed - have no idea if they are "clean" or not). And although it did originate in my okeetee lines, I have sold those throughout the US and abroad since the '80s. So I don't see how any one breeder is going to be more likely to have a higher concentration, unless maybe they specialize in sunkissed combos, and have not tested them yet.
 
Back
Top