We can't all catch big fish, I can only catch trout...
Which one of the scientific facts that I listed is false?
Why is hybridizing wrong ethically and inbreeding not?
I do not know any human beings (although I speculate there are a few that do exist) that think it is okay for a man and an ape to be together (or any other kind of animal), nor do I know any that think it's okay for a man to be with his sister or cousins, mom, aunts or grandmother or daughter even. Yet in the animal world inbreeding is smiled upon, while hybridizing is frowned upon.
While I think that it would be critical to maintain a hybrid free line of animals if you are planning on re-introducing them into nature, I do not think the same standard needs to be upheld with animals that are kept outside of nature. I understand the desire of many to have pure bred lines, and I do not think you are stupid for wanting to have such, but I also understand that others do not share your sentiment, and the fact that there are many keepers out there that can't tell a garter snake from an anaconda, and out of their ignorance create hybrids and label them as non-hybrids. No, that shouldn't be done, but we can't police every tom, dick and harry out there. There are bigger fish to fry (like world peace, hunger, and people that don't have access to big fishing boats). Your opinion might be different than mine, and you are entitled to it, just as I am entitled to mine. But to use your own words ...
Up until now I have not even stated my true opinions when I have posted, just merely pointing out that many disagree with you for various reasons.
Am I right? Am I wrong? I'm neither, because there is no right or wrong here, just people's opinions. There are no universal truths here, just people's opinions.
And just to let you know the only reason why I hate you (and it's not really hate, it's jealousy) is because you have a big fishing boat and I do not. Hey, one last question, what would you do if you caught a Tiger Muskie?