Thanks Dave! He's a beauty! And your coral tesseras? Um ya, want one!
I have a general question regarding pink coloration in corns, to anyone who has thoughts on the matter. Is it only the lavender gene, or all pink morphs in general that really show more color in males? I want a sweet pink corn, but a female, and I'm hearing that males really get pinker at least in the lavender morphs.
Seems everyone is looking to tie the entire coral/salmon/pink snow cornsnake morphs down to being amel+anery base, +something else. There are ten thousand un-named Locality, that is, wild visual variations of corn snakes. Perhaps I am under-estimating. I remember well the time I was wrong.
Some genes SEEM ABLE TO BE (I am not saying that they are) split off in a few different directions, and then given names of their own. Bloodred/Diffused (now has two names), and that thick red coating that the oldschool original bloodreds carried. Those annoying white bellies the old school breeders had, they wanted those to go away, they wanted that wrap-around red coating to go all the way around on their bodies. Then someone fiddled with that white belly, and it began to creep up their sides. The Diffusion, the way the pattern on the sides. The base color: Heavy deep red color but not necessarily a lot of black melanin iridophores or whatever those color-holding-pores of skin are called. And if it has split belly checkers. Sheesh. I hate to drag Masque into this, carrying the "HEAD MARKER" as well. (bloodred? masque? etc. Nevermind the new gray/white headed bloodreds.
Surmise. Bloodred=
1 Bloodred
2 Masque? & split belly checkers
3 Pied
4 Red coating
5 Diffused
6 Whatever-the-name-is for the base color. I'm naming it Daveberry. There. I just created a gene, right before your eyes. Very eyes, that is. Like movie stars, right here on the interwebs.
It SEEMS that Bloodred has been chiseled away into all of these other components, parts of the bloodred gene are now considered several other genes. Where does it ever end? What if you could chisel away little bits and pieces of
all other gene names and traits and
Visual Components of the known Genes--
you, as each individual, are able to see move away in your own selective breedings.
Line breed for that specific particle of a gene,
since its a visual trait the first time you spot it
for 5 generations to refine, so that it behaves with Mendy's Punnet Box Predictability calculator
Now get busy in the corn kitchen & whip me up some neon rainbow snow!
Thanks for sharing-
dp
ps, a couple of random
Thoughts:
next time you see any classic aka 'normal' snake, of any kind for that matter, and think of all of the different simple recessive genes, try to imagine how each of the colors you are looking at will translate to amel, or one of the aneries (caramel, charcoal, Anery A, lavender, silver-something 1, 2, &3 or whatever they're called, etc. The definition of anery is "no red"; therefore I left Cinder out). Sometimes, what my old eyes perceive to just be black on a wild-caught cornsnake, mixed with an anery, in the F1 proves out blue upon closer inspection. Also consider there are layers of skin, so if a heavy red layer of skin is on the outside of the scales, everything underlying may be blocked by that darker, light-wavelength absorbing--- layer of exo-color. There is still so much we do not know.
I don't usually post photos of dilute charcoal anery copper hypo lavender caramel masque ExtremeChipsOffManyGene holdback treasures, but when I do, it usually just means I don't often disclose everything inside pets on the available list. It's not really an issue to me. I don't breed for capturing specific genes, I breed for visual color. I know it's an issue for some, to be able to neatly and tidy-like compartmentalize every attribute, and if that's what someone needs, who am I to judge?