Castro used candy. Hitler used the military "games" and "camps." Obama is using the letters to tell how the kids can help HIM. Not America. Not the office of the president...but HIM PERSONALLY. It is all indoctrination. Dictators get into office and they make people (especially the younger) believe that getting him out isn't even thinkable. Obviously, there is no similarities at all between what he does and what others have done. None at all. Anyone that sees one in insane.
Mike (the ~mike~ one), the news doesn't always report the truth. For or aginst my personal opinions it doesn't matter: they are often WAY too biased. Just don't trust it. Some Americans are still completely in his corner, some are completely against him, but more and more of the "middle ground" are leaving his side and leaning away from him. Plus, he was voted in on his promises - many of which are the OPPOSITE of what he is doing now. It doesn't matter if he was elected. We don't have to respect him if he lied to obtain the office. We don't have to calmly accept what he is doing. The MAN was voted in - not his policies. Those have to be voted in my Congress and such no matter HOW much he hates that fact. Well, except the Czars.
Also, majority doesn't win that election. We are a republic and not a true democracy. In general, the majority of VOTERS that actually vote (not people) do usually decide who wins, but that isn't always the case. Remember it is a republic. It doesn't matter here, though. I don't personally feel the system is broken. I like the republic system. It's the fact that one party more than another has found they can BUY votes by giving money from workers to nonworkers, illegal aliens, etc. It's the breads and circuses concept coming to life, and the workers that have to pay for it aren't all liking it.
The anger is because more and more is taken from the productive members of society and given to the users in society who do nothing to work with it. Wht would a productive member of society continue to work hard if it means more and more of his money just keeps going to people that refuse to work? Heck, even my wife and I have taken jobs for less than what we could get elsewhere because we don't see the point. Why worker harder (and be more productive) just to give more to the lazy ones that won't work? We have enough now. More and it'd just mean we give MORE to those that do nothing. ...and this is why socialism fails.
KJ