KJUN, is the term diffused still acceptable for corns homo for blood but not showing the bloodred colouring i.e Lavender-Bloodred, Ghost-Bloodred etc?
I can only tell you my opinion. There is no "Committee of Acceptable Cornsnake Trade Names" except in the minds of a couple of people.....lol. I don't accept "diffuse" period. With 90% of cornsnake people, they KNOW what I mean when I say Lavender bloodred, but they have no clue what a "lavender diffuse" would be. Less than 10% of corn keepers, in all actually, have any real clue what diffuse means, but almost all of them have at least heard the term blood or bloodred.
Bloodred is the name of the mutation in my book - and not a color. The term diffuse makes people thinking we have a NEW morph; hence, that leads to more confusion - not less. If it would have been called diffuse from the start, then that would be different. Heck, it is a better description, but it a a more confusing description in TODAY'S setting. (We can't even get people to switch to m,etric here, and metrci concersion makes SENSE!) I've even seen people asking how to produce a cornsnake het for bloodred and diffuse.....lol.
"Diffuse," as far as I am personally concerned, is a term started by people that had nothing to do with the morph, but wanted to have something to point to as a "legacy." Instead of DOING something, they change a name and pretend they benefited (instead of harmed) the hobby. KJ's opinion only. :bowdown:
That's my personal opinions and a typical rant for me. I don't pretend to believe my opinion should count for anything other than, well, my opinion. I just don't like being told by one clique that THEY decide the names, OTHER names are wrong, and THEY even decide WHICH names they allow people to pick from. It chaps my behind that they feel, for some unknown reason, that they have more of a right to name a morph than the originator.
If you created a cornsnake - new morph from a WC mutation - that you called a maugarita cornsnake. How would you feel if they called your name "stupid" (actual scenario that happened with a different morph name), then tried to insist the hobby calls it something else (which happened with lots of other morphs), or stole a name from your morph that you used first because you weren't part of their specific clique (again, it happened)? You wouldn't feel happy, I bet. That's why I don't accept diffuse - it isn't the name for the mutation the hobby accepted from the first guys that named the morph.
By the way, none of the above examples involve me, so it isn't a personal vendetta on my part. If they tried to change a name of a morph I created, I'd just ignore them and not get bothered. It is the principle of the thing.
Oh, yeah...and they delete posts that ask why they even NEED to change the name of a new morph......lol.
KJ