Yes, each clutch was evenly divided into the 4 groups. The groups started out at n=15/16 from 3 clutches. Because of the strict "no more than 1 refusal ever, even with shedding" rule, the numbers that completed all 15 feedings with never more than one refusal (offering food every 5 to 7 days) ended up pretty evenly distributed across clutches at n=5/6.
Here's the messy graph with all cases showing. Red = control, Blue = 2 cuts, Green = 2 cuts plus cavity perforation, Yellow = 4 cuts.
(forgive the 1 through 16 on this graph, I didn't assign the first entry to 0 which was the prefeeding / hatch weight)
You can see the trend, even with the busy graph. You've got some of the lower end of the test groups ending up lower than the top 2 in the red group, but the trend is visible, even on this graph. Those areas where you see drops in some hatchlings' weights generally coincided with shedding and skipping one meal.
For comparison, here is the graph again showing the averages of the groups and purple = averages of all test groups for comparison to the controls.
This makes things a little cleaner and easy to see.
I am definitely interested in running this study again to ensure it can be duplicated and am interested in anyone wishing to run the same study independently on their own hatchlings. Feel free to contact me at
[email protected]. The results were pretty dramatic. Much more so than I expected to see, quite honestly. I don't doubt that the experiment can be duplicated with similar results, but I would like to have more numbers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big grin :D :D"
You can always use more numbers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"