RobbiesCornField
Bring it on.
P.S. Anyone is welcome to join me too. :dgrin:
Coming up next... a raffle to cover drinks in Carol's room. LOL.
And the Margarita/Daiquiri blender for Robbie's house. :laugh:
P.S. Anyone is welcome to join me too. :dgrin:
Coming up next... a raffle to cover drinks in Carol's room. LOL.
And the Margarita/Daiquiri blender for Robbie's house. :laugh:
It's my weekend mission to convert you to "on the rocks".
Dale
P.S. Anyone is welcome to join me too. :dgrin:
Coming up next... a raffle to cover drinks in Carol's room. LOL.
Hey, I like 'ritas on the rocks. But blended is also nice, too! Especially when you're too sloshed and don't want to choke on an ice cube. :rofl:
So, while sloshed, you'd rather deal with the blades of a blender? :grin01:
Dale
(I've said it before...I am SO looking forward to partying with you!)
It's harder for me to get my hand into the blender... because I usually can't take the lid off. At that point, someone else is making 'em FOR me!
By the way, I make a KILLER Mudslide. And can pour a pretty good BJ, too!
We run a small raffle every month for our local herp society. Tickets are $1 each and we have a live bucket and dry goods bucket. The first winner gets pick of whatever they want, and so on down the line. I don't think we would sell many tickets if NOBODY got any choice, not even the 1st and 2nd winners (if prizes were decided on ahead of time instead of chosen by the winners). I think purchasers look at it as 1st prize winner, 2nd prize winner, etc, as the drawing progresses. At least every winner gets SOME choice, except for the very last person. We could even CALL it grand prize winner (1st winner), 2nd prize, etc, to dispel the idea of being unhappy with the choices left.
I generally drink Diet Coke, so am happy to "go with the flow" with any decisions concerning alcohol.
This is exactly what I was talking about in my post above. Great minds think alike.
In that case, however, we really don't need two buckets because if you don't want a live animal then you pick something else and as I said in my above post, if you don't want anything that is left on the table you can always pass.
$1 for tickets sounds good.
I don't need a bar if it is extra. I'm a beer snob so the stuff a bar will distribute probably won't make it to my sophisticated palette.
OOOHHH. Joe just came up with a really good idea that I think would make this even more "fair"....
So we pick a ticket out of the bucket and call out the winner....
That person then comes up and draws out of a bucket that has pieces of paper with all the prizes on it. Whichever one they draw - that is their prize.... (and for those not present from buying tickets online - we would have someone designated to draw their prize for them).
That way WE aren't choosing the prize for them, but it isn't like they are going to necessarily pick the "best" prize first either....
What do you guys think?
Mmmmm... Mudslide. How about a White Russian?
Ok - concensus so far looks like we will be ok without a bar. If anyone REALLY wants a drink - the hotel pantry does sell beer - so that could be up to the individual.
As far as the raffle...I am just really concerned that by letting people pick their prizes - it is going to leave the "less desirable" stuff (for lack of a better word) for last which may lead to some people feeling badly or that it isn't "fair". I think we need to have a little more control over the handing out of prizes then that to avoid any possible issues. If someone doesn't like the prize they won - well, it is their prize - they can do with it what they want. Trade with someone else, sell it when they get home or what not.
I also don't think picking a prize vs having a prize drawn and handed to them is going to change the amount of tickets sold.
And I think $1 a ticket is awfully low - especially considering what some of the prizes will probably be - and the fact that ultimately - the goal of the raffle is to raise money for a charity. At a $1 a ticket - we aren't going to raise squat. Makes more sense to me to do $5 a ticket or 5 for $20.
OOOHHH. Joe just came up with a really good idea that I think would make this even more "fair"....
So we pick a ticket out of the bucket and call out the winner....
That person then comes up and draws out of a bucket that has pieces of paper with all the prizes on it. Whichever one they draw - that is their prize.... (and for those not present from buying tickets online - we would have someone designated to draw their prize for them).
That way WE aren't choosing the prize for them, but it isn't like they are going to necessarily pick the "best" prize first either....
What do you guys think?
The drawing for prizes would be better than somebody deciding for everyone else what they get.
How about this:
We divide prizes into groups of more expensive and less expensive items (dividing point depends on what is getting donated - maybe $50?? or $25?? or $75??). The less expensive group goes for $1 tickets and the more expensive for $5 tickets??
I'm not really sure I like that idea.
Don't get me wrong, it could work, I'm just not sure I like it.
It's discrimination against people with budget issues! LOL.
<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I know we have discussed doing individual buckets for each prize - but what I am worried about is that some prizes may not get many entries...which is good for the people trying to win, but also may mean less ticket sales. And ultimately what we are trying to do is raise money for a charity..so more ticket sales are better.At a knitting gathering I was at last year (to see The Yarn Harlot), they were doing raffles. Each prize had it's own bowl, that way you could choose which prize you wanted to try for. I think they had maybe 6-8 different prizes to try for. They also had a bunch of door prizes that you got entered for when you bought your ticket for the event. All their money raised went to Doctors Without Borders, which seems to be a pretty popular charity in knitting circles.
I do fully understand what you mean. And honestly, I would love to do it like that. I just don't know if everyone will be willing to buy as many if the tickets are that cheap - and again - my ultimate goal here is to raise money for a charity. I figure if someone wants to buy just one ticket...is better to raise $5 for that one ticket than $1. And yes, even though more tickets means better odds, it still does only take one ticket to win.At $5/ticket, I would probably only buy 1 ticket, just because. At $1 at ticket, I would probably buy at least 10, possibly more because that would give me more chances at winning. YKWIM?