Miqote
New member
If someone cannot pay for the care of their pet, they should not have gotten the pet in the first place.
I hate the way so many people seem to selfishly acquire animals only to give them up as soon as any problems or financial burdens arise.
P.S.- (I know this is mean, but I've read this entire thread and it's been torturing me...) Can you spell "spell check"?
I just adopted a kitten in April. I'd waited years to finally get a cat, but due to a housing situation (roommate allergic) I never could. Two weeks after acquiring Ainsley, we noticed him limping and reluctant to jump or run. I thought he'd broken his leg. It turns out he had a genetic condition where his kneecap is shaped incorrectly and dislocates and he couldn't "pop" it back in. The original vet told us surgery would be $1200 - which is well beyond my means to afford, and if I didn't get help from the animal shelter and a very nice vet (who did the surgery for a fraction of the cost) I would've had to surrender him as much as it would've broken my heart!
Was I selfish to get a kitten without having $1200+ in the bank? Maybe? I don't know. To me it sounds like the OP is in a similar financial situation, but luckily he is taking the steps to learn how to care for his snake in the best way possible and has decided not to feed live (which will help avoid any costly vet bills!)
Good luck with your snake Checkers