tsst
Deuce is watching!
Pleeaaaseee! Some are just too busy getting fitted for the next four years.Over dramatic my eye. Have you even read the full Obamacare policy?
Pleeaaaseee! Some are just too busy getting fitted for the next four years.Over dramatic my eye. Have you even read the full Obamacare policy?
What sufficient info do you speak of? What info did you use about Romney to decide he is worse than the last 4 years?"Sufficient information to choose between the TWO".
But this is where I throw my hands up and walk away. People are going to be upset for a while, and no reasonable discussions can be had as long as people are responding to everything with bitterness.
What sufficient info do you speak of? What info did you use about Romney to decide he is worse than the last 4 years?
I am worried about the next 4 years our country cannot take another four years of political grid lock. I sincerely hope DC can get together and do the right thing for us 'the people' and not their ego.
There has been no compromise or co-operation in this country since the Clinton POTUS and pub controlled congress and senate. :shrugs:Good lord.
I guess there is no moving forward. No compromise, no co-operation. Only suspicion, animosity and the persistent belief that anyone that disagrees is a fool or a villain.
http://devontexas.wordpress.com/2012/10/07/dialysis-and-obamacare/
Good luck, America.
There has been no compromise or co-operation in this country since the Clinton POTUS and pub controlled congress and senate. :shrugs:
I don't really care who started it(that can be debated either way). Otherwise you're preaching to the choir(expression no pun) if it's actually compromise and co-operation. If it's Obamacare, we'll shove it down your throat type of forward, then by all means I want obstruction.Then shouldn't the response be "Let's fix that" rather than "They started it"?
Look, there are obviously problems with every candidate. There's no such thing as a perfect solution.
But this whole notion of "let's stand in the President's/party's/insertyourtitle here's way because we didn't get ours and that'll show them!" is just ridiculous.
They're shooting themselves in the foot and screwing the people over in the process, to prove points they're failing to prove.
Someone's got to be the bigger man, so to speak, and compromise, even if they don't wanna. It's human nature to want to be the winner and to be right, whatever that means for the individual, but there comes a point at which you have to look around and realize that being "right" is making things worse. For everyone.
I don't really care who started it(that can be debated either way). Otherwise you're preaching to the choir(expression no pun) if it's actually compromise and co-operation. If it's Obamacare, we'll shove it down your throat type of forward, then by all means I want obstruction.
Since you are new here for the record I am libertarian/independent/constitution believing fiscal conservative social moderate. I don't want either side in my life more than our forefathers intended. Adding to the gov for the sake of adding is not forward IMHO.
I think the fedgov should not be in religion, abortion, healthcare, education, gun control, bailouts, private bedrooms, marriage, etc, etc, etc.... I believe in the US Constitution and the bill of rights. I don't believe we need a fedgov as a nanny.