I did make the point the reason deer and coyotes are so overpopulated is from lack of wolves and bear predator we humans have stupidly killed off for sport and fear; but how much do you think giving birth control to millions of animals would cost? We can't feed our poor, give them homes, and educate our nation- but we should spend billions a year to make sure our animal population remains in check? Hmm...sounds like a big waste of money to me not to mention no town or city can afford this and would look to our federal government to foot the bill. You have to look at this realistically here birth control for multiple animal species is just not possible, relocating them is basically making it someone elses problem, and these animals pose a danger to us. I feel more entitled to my safety than the safety of a deer or coyote anyday and would like to see taxpayer money help the taxpayers and not sterilize dear. Also would wide scale birth control then pose an extinction risk to these species? I never said kill every deer and coyote out there now and sterilizing them on a wide scale would deplete populations far quicker than a few hunters. People hunt for food still in this day in age as a need and I for one don't think hindering this right will do anything positive for mankind. I don't think killing an animal to kill it is o.k and I don't shoot the deer that eat my plants and poop in my yard, nor would I want anyone with a loaded gun shooting up wildlife in my neighborhood come on thats just stupid man. I do realize we share a habitat with our furry friends and they play an important role in keeping ecosystems stable, but when these numbers of friends throw off stability due to overpopulation I do believe in shooting them to restore balance. Sorry this makes no sense to you, but it's a pretty simple concept really. We live with a limited number of resources, with limited room, and allowing everything to thrive to the point of over abundence is just irresponsible. There should be and are limits on hunting specific species to protect and ensure populations, but to say hunting is just flat out wrong is negligent.