• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

stupid breeders why cant you just leave things be

Carpe Serpentis said:
Hate speech, denigrating others... how is that even logically a good thing?
If denigrating others is okay and the intent of denigrating another is to hurt them the same way that cursing or swearing is intended to do, then I am am deeply confused about the rules of this forum. You can hurt much more intensely with repeatedly bashing another person than you can with a single swear word. I don't have time for this right now, but I would like to ask three question.
How is hurting someone intentionally via repeatedly calling them stupid, making references to them being a character on charlie brown, etc. any different than simply cussing or swearing at them? Is the intent to hurt not the same? Is this allowed on this forum?
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/hatespeech.htm
I'd find more links for you, but I don't think they would help.
Click to expand...

I don't like hate speech any more than the next guy. The church that protests military funerals really gets on my nerves as well. But, Free speech is Free. It is what You, your family, myself, and my family, and all of our brothers and sisters in uniform have fought for. Good or not, it is here as long as we are still a free country.
 
Outcast said:
I don't like hate speech any more than the next guy. The church that protests military funerals really gets on my nerves as well. But, Free speech is Free. It is what You, your family, myself, and my family, and all of our brothers and sisters in uniform have fought for. Good or not, it is here as long as we are still a free country.
Click to expand...

I missed you around here. Glad you are back.
 
:noevil:My point for asking the below question should be obvious. If you don't see anything wrong with denigrating a person repeatedly and the intent of denigration is to cause harm in the same manner as a single swear word might depending on how it was used... Then, I'm asking you to grow a pair and simply use the words you know you really want to use. The intent is after all the same and the effects are no different.

Or, simply concede that I am right and it is wrong to repeatedly denigrate another person trying to cause hurt and get on with a meaningful discussion. There is no harm in a polite meaningful debate or conversation.:noevil:
I like hybrids. :noevil: I like hybrids.
Carpe Serpentis said:
Hate speech, denigrating others... how is that even logically a good thing?
If denigrating others is okay and the intent of denigrating another is to hurt them the same way that cursing or swearing is intended to do, then I am am deeply confused about the rules of this forum. You can hurt much more intensely with repeatedly bashing another person than you can with a single swear word. I don't have time for this right now, but I would like to ask three question.
How is hurting someone intentionally via repeatedly calling them stupid, making references to them being a character on charlie brown, etc. any different than simply cussing or swearing at them? Is the intent to hurt not the same? Is this allowed on this forum?
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/hatespeech.htm
I'd find more links for you, but I don't think they would help.
Click to expand...
 
If I had a dollar for everytime the word "denigrate" has been used in this thread......

Sorry but you are either for free speech, or against it.
 
http://www.cornsnakes.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1485157#post1485157
Outcast, I was given an infraction for this comment. Now, if you can believe that, I did not even aim that at a member, I simply used it to describe an action that was being done to me. So, if this forum promotes denigrating another by calling them stupid and such... I have some issues with this. Trying to silence a person by denigrating them is not proper any way you spin it. Suffice it to say, that infraction shows favoritism if others are allowed to do the same. I've seen much more posted in this thread and others using the names of snakes to refer to body parts often utilized.... sorry, but I've got to go. Its my sons birthday.
 
Kokopelli said:

​
BTW, the tip of the organ has nothing to do with the sensation of an orgasm- it MIGHT affect how quickly you reach that point- you're throwing stuff around and claiming them to be absolute facts but they really aren't.

​
No, branding live-stock is definitely inhumane- so… the fact that there are cruel acts endorsed in the world that means it's OK to do the same? That's a very interesting concept but I have to disagree with it.​
Click to expand...

sorry the baby still hast to suffer with a sore penis for over a week and has no say in the matter nor given pain killers while he heals.

Yes the tip of the penis is very sensitive and it has been clinically proven fact that a uncircumcised penis is more sensitive than a circumcised penis as it desensitizes the tip of the penis's nerve endings over time due to it being unprojected. Maybe if you used your penis you would know what every male on this earth knows that the nerve in the penis that gives you pleasure is right below the head of the penis and runs through the tip of the head. The circumcision runs right through the bottom of the nerve where the nerve come up to the top of the skin. If you don't belive me take a look for your self where the scar runs right across the bottom of the nerve.

Now I cut the hemipean off at the base of it removing the whole hemipean not just the tip. And yes it my have some nerve endings but no where near a sexually mature male snake
 
Vinman said:
Maybe if you used your penis you would know what every male on this earth knows that the nerve in the penis that gives you pleasure is right below the head of the penis and runs through the tip of the head. The circumcision runs right through the bottom of the nerve where the nerve come up to the top of the skin. If you don't belive me take a look for your self where the scar runs right across the bottom of the nerve.
Click to expand...

The frenulum may be sensitive, but it is not a nerve...
 
Vinman said:
sorry the baby still hast to suffer with a sore penis for over a week and has no say in the matter nor given pain killers while he heals.

Yes the tip of the penis is very sensitive and it has been clinically proven fact that a uncircumcised penis is more sensitive than a circumcised desensitizes as the tip of the penis over time due to it being unprojected. Maybe if you used your penis you would know what every male on this earth knows that the nerve in the penis that gives you pleasure is right below the head of the penis and runs through the tip of the head. The circumcision runs right through the bottom of the nerve where the nerve come up to the top of the skin. If you don't belive me take a look for your self where the scar runs right across the bottom of the nerve.

Now I cut the hemipean off at the base of it removing the whole hemipean not just the tip.
Click to expand...

Man oh man are you a civilized individual.

​
Well, without making remarks about how you use your private organs- I hardly care nor is your feeble attempt at reducing anything of my masculinity with a joke that belongs at high-school at best doing anything to validate the nonsense you spew… you're repeating what I'm saying.​
Orgasms are induced by the brain, the level of sensitivity and speed with which one reaches an orgasm is affected, nothing else. So we are better in bed, you're saying?

​
If you keep on saying the same thing I'm not going to correct you again… it's becoming tiresome.

​
Rabbi's use ointments to relieve pain and ensure there's no infection. You don't do that… you just merrily chop hemi-penis's off. And again… it's not mandatory… ah yes, they also don't remove the entire penis…​
If somehow what you're saying makes sense to you… well, gosh, have fun with that.

​
Have fun chopping off organs to preserve your conception of purity while not using anesthetics and antibiotics.​
 
Nanci said:
The frenulum may be sensitive, but it is not a nerve...
Click to expand...

no but the nerve runs about 2 inches below it ( depending how big you are ) and goes up to the tip.

No Nanci I was born a Catholic here in the states and I'm circumcised. but it was the jews that made the pratice very popular
 
Kokopelli said:
Man oh man are you a civilized individual.

​
Well, without making remarks about how you use your private organs- I hardly care nor is your feeble attempt at reducing anything of my masculinity with a joke that belongs at high-school at best doing anything to validate the nonsense you spew… you're repeating what I'm saying.​
Orgasms are induced by the brain, the level of sensitivity and speed with which one reaches an orgasm is affected, nothing else. So we are better in bed, you're saying?

​
If you keep on saying the same thing I'm not going to correct you again… it's becoming tiresome.

​
Rabbi's use ointments to relieve pain and ensure there's no infection. You don't do that… you just merrily chop hemi-penis's off. And again… it's not mandatory… ah yes, they also don't remove the entire penis…​
If somehow what you're saying makes sense to you… well, gosh, have fun with that.

​
Have fun chopping off organs to preserve your conception of purity while not using anesthetics and antibiotics.​
Click to expand...



All I'm gonna say, is that I've agreed with every last word of each of your posts here.
 
Ah I also find it IMMENSELY amusing to see that a person who is so extreme about purity breeds hybrids himself.

You sir, are the epitome of convinience-moral.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top