• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

2010 SPRING/SUMMER PHOTO CONTEST!

:uhoh: :idea: not to be a spoiler , but based on exif information both those photos were taken w/ the same camera ;) so I would say yes.

from looking at a certain persons photos I could tell you who's camera that is too (but I wont), so I know who took the photos ;) YAY to them :dancer:

lol, one reason EXIF info should be stripped sometimes.
 
I guess maybe I need more information on what EXIF is... I'm not sure...

As for the winners, I'm posting them today. Sorry for the delay. I made the mistake of not noting who submitted what so I have to go over and over all the emails to find names before I can submit a winners thread.
 
I guess maybe I need more information on what EXIF is... I'm not sure...

As for the winners, I'm posting them today. Sorry for the delay. I made the mistake of not noting who submitted what so I have to go over and over all the emails to find names before I can submit a winners thread.

It's not really important. :shrugs: Just conversation while waiting on the announcement.

Exchangeable image file format (Exif)
It's just information that is attached to every photo taken that includes information regarding that photo (ie camera make, camera settings, date, time, etc etc) If you need a full explanation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format


If you use firefox & have the exif viewer 'on' then when you right click over a photo you can click to view this info, its useful if you belong to photo forums when you like a photo to see what ISO/settings/lens they used in the photo w/o having to ask. Sometimes the info is stripped & you have to ask anyway, most of the time not.

Anyway, I look forward to seeing the winners. There were alot of great entries. :dancer:
 
I'm guessing the two mentioned are the ones that I pegged belonged to the same person, not because of exif, but because the photos are similar styles and settings ^_^
 
The results are up!!

Winners!

Please PLEASE give me all the feedback you can on this so our next contest can be even better :). Yes, I know time was a bit of an issue here.. I was a bit behind on some deadlines.

On top of that, please let me know what you'd like to see next time or if you think something needs changed. :D
 
I don't think you need to change anything. You had it really organised.
Thank you again!!
 
I think it was great!

I can think of 2 things, if it helps....

1) Someone mentioned letting people choose their top 3 or somesuch in each category. That sounds like a good idea.

2) I would love to see more emphasis on the photos reflecting the chosen theme, whether that be Spring/Summer, "Your Silliest Snake", "Snakes on Props", "Fun things to do with Snakes", whatever :). I like themed contests where the entries reflect the chosen theme. Makes things less ambiguous and more clear (and/or both! LOL!).

Congratulations to everyone. I think every photo entered was fantastic, and the winning entries are truly special, imho.
 
While I think more emphasis on the "theme" of the photo contest would be fine, I would personally prefer some of the contests NOT to be heavily themed. The contests that have been all theme-y in the past have never interested me enough to enter, and sometimes, not even enough to vote. So maybe maintaining a mix to satisfy a broad range of aesthetic palates would be good.
 
Well, seeing as it was themed, most folks decided to go with the spring/summer idea. If it was "Cool Photos of Your Snakes" or "Corns in Cups" then I'm sure other people would have had some really neat ideas not based around spring/summer.
 
To be honest, I agree with desert. I've found that most photo contests do not have themes but categories. Themes normally detract from the contest rather than add, but that's just me...
 
There were categories, so to say. I really enjoyed the theme because it sets you in the mood and isn't a "Take the best picture of the most expensive corn with an amazing camera contest".

As far as I'm concerned, Jadie did a really nice job of setting this up and like I said before; I'd love to see another one soon with a fall/winter theme.
 
Well, seeing as it was themed, most folks decided to go with the spring/summer idea. If it was "Cool Photos of Your Snakes" or "Corns in Cups" then I'm sure other people would have had some really neat ideas not based around spring/summer.

Well, seeing as some people read the directions of the contest very carefully, not everyone decided to go with an overtly spring/summer idea. In fact, none of the first place winners in any of the categories was overtly spring/summer-themed, and all were voted on by a populous who, presumably, also read the contest directions, and who did not, in general, find the winning photographs to be deficient based on the contest criteria.
 
There were categories, so to say. I really enjoyed the theme because it sets you in the mood and isn't a "Take the best picture of the most expensive corn with an amazing camera contest".

As far as I'm concerned, Jadie did a really nice job of setting this up and like I said before; I'd love to see another one soon with a fall/winter theme.

I'm not saying that Jadie didn't do a great job, she really did and I'm completely appreciative of her time and efforts. I also realize that there were categories and I think she made a great decision by adding them. What I'm saying about the "themes" that most snake forums use for their photo contests (and notice I said snake forums because all photography forums I belong to have never had a theme on their photo contests, just categories or it was a complete free-for-all based on the photography itself (composition, clarity, creativity, execution, etc.). Let me ask you this, does NARBC come up with a theme for its photo comps? Does WPPA? Does the PPA? Just some food for thought...

Ahh and there it is. I've always said, it does NOT matter what equipment you use, a good photographer captures the photo with their eye and creativity, not with their equipment. That's why some of the best will do most of their projects with P&S cameras or iPhones or whatever. They want it to completely be about their view of the world and not the equipment their shooting it with. They will use their equipment for shooting fashion covers or whatever because that is what the client is asking of them and what they expect to have on set and see on set. What it really comes down to, however, is their ability to see light. I've seen some of the most beautiful compositions come from a photographer who noticed light bouncing off of a window and took the photo using a Canon P&S that allowed them to set some of the settings manually. You would have thought it was a cover layout and with a little adjustment in photoshop it was ridiculous how good the photo was. So, blaming equipment or resources is a crutch IMO. If you feel like its the snake or animal that is going to win it for you, then go to the zoo! That's what I did and it seemed to work out fine. That photo was shot through glass without any ability to work with the snake. I just waited for the right lighting to hit, no reflection off the glass to flare, and for the snake to be positioned under the light well enough to really accent it and allow its darker surroundings to fade to black.

Of course this is all my opinion and everybody enters a photo contest for different reasons. I enjoy the more technical, execution side of the contest, others enjoy putting props around their snakes and trying to "theme" the contest. Its all about who you are and what you enjoy :) If you think that it should be themed, that people should have to stick to a specific theme or be shunned, and that cameras and animals will be the deciding factor. Then run the next contest learning from how well Jadie ran this one, except make it be all about the theme, only allow photos to be taken of Normal corns, allow no digital manipulation, and photos can only be taken with cell phone cameras with a 3 MP or below camera. That would pretty much take care of all "unfairness" in the contest... just don't expect many people to enter :)
 
I'm not saying that Jadie didn't do a great job, she really did and I'm completely appreciative of her time and efforts. I also realize that there were categories and I think she made a great decision by adding them. What I'm saying about the "themes" that most snake forums use for their photo contests (and notice I said snake forums because all photography forums I belong to have never had a theme on their photo contests, just categories or it was a complete free-for-all based on the photography itself (composition, clarity, creativity, execution, etc.). Let me ask you this, does NARBC come up with a theme for its photo comps? Does WPPA? Does the PPA? Just some food for thought...

Ahh and there it is. I've always said, it does NOT matter what equipment you use, a good photographer captures the photo with their eye and creativity, not with their equipment. That's why some of the best will do most of their projects with P&S cameras or iPhones or whatever. They want it to completely be about their view of the world and not the equipment their shooting it with. They will use their equipment for shooting fashion covers or whatever because that is what the client is asking of them and what they expect to have on set and see on set. What it really comes down to, however, is their ability to see light. I've seen some of the most beautiful compositions come from a photographer who noticed light bouncing off of a window and took the photo using a Canon P&S that allowed them to set some of the settings manually. You would have thought it was a cover layout and with a little adjustment in photoshop it was ridiculous how good the photo was. So, blaming equipment or resources is a crutch IMO. If you feel like its the snake or animal that is going to win it for you, then go to the zoo! That's what I did and it seemed to work out fine. That photo was shot through glass without any ability to work with the snake. I just waited for the right lighting to hit, no reflection off the glass to flare, and for the snake to be positioned under the light well enough to really accent it and allow its darker surroundings to fade to black.

Of course this is all my opinion and everybody enters a photo contest for different reasons. I enjoy the more technical, execution side of the contest, others enjoy putting props around their snakes and trying to "theme" the contest. Its all about who you are and what you enjoy :) If you think that it should be themed, that people should have to stick to a specific theme or be shunned, and that cameras and animals will be the deciding factor. Then run the next contest learning from how well Jadie ran this one, except make it be all about the theme, only allow photos to be taken of Normal corns, allow no digital manipulation, and photos can only be taken with cell phone cameras with a 3 MP or below camera. That would pretty much take care of all "unfairness" in the contest... just don't expect many people to enter :)

Well, to be honest, this photo competition was themed. And he wasn't blaming equipment, but it does seem like the flashy morphs get a little more attention. I mean, second and third place this year were "normals," but it hasn't really seemed that way in some contests. Sure, an awesome camera helps a lot with blur and stuff, but like I said, he wasn't blaming equipment.

Oh, and no one said anything about any "unfairness." :)
 
Anyway, the point was this WAS a themed contest and as far as this is going it seems like a lot of useless argueing.

It's not a question of using equipment as a crutch. I had a crummy point and shoot, and I mean a bad one before this contest was over. It actually pushed me to go buy a DSLR from Canon. My photo wasn't godawful...could have been much better, especially with this camera - but that's life. I know I couldn't have gotten a picture like you have with my old camera, that's for sure.

But I'm not "complaining" about your entry at all. I liked it a lot. I just feel like some of the people in the cornsnake category got "robbed" so to say. A lot of them went out and propped with summer ideas and themes - to have something with a white background and a mug win. Don't get me wrong. It's a beautiful picture. It is. I just don't think it belonged at all. It's also not to say that whoever took that picture didn't work a lot to get the lighting/definition right. I hadn't entered the Cornsnakes category so I'm not making any biased judgements.

As for the smart sarcasm at the end of the post. Wasn't needed. Although I love smiley faces.
 
:nope: My picture was taken with a 5 megapixel P&S... all I'm sayin. When you are dealing w/ 600x400 web images MEGAPIXELS do not matter.

seriously... this picture of my one of my 6 year old sons at the dentist with my 1.5 megapixel LG Cellphone. When resized to 600x400 for web viewing... honestly, megapixels do not matter.

4774108759_6130df98e6_b.jpg


Everyone did a great job. When you shoot, get nice clarity on your subjects face, since its a snake, perhaps its body too, you dont really want a cluttered background & hope others like it too. Really all that matters is that you are happy w/ your photo in the end. If you are not happy with it, then chances are, its not very good & you should try again.

I look forward to the next contest, I have a feeling we are going to see alot of great photos :dancer:
 
Back
Top