• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Have you noticed the changes on the forum?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I finally finished reading all 100+ posts (so far) in this thread (I spotted it this morning but was only able to read the first few posts before having to do the necessary motherly duties to get my children off to school, and then myself off to work). There have been many excellent points brought up.

I, too, have noticed a change in the tone in some of the threads here on CS.com. But when you create a General Chit-Chat forum, you'll get some threads that tend to attract a different tone. I will be the first to admit that most of the "Forget the snakes..." thread has remained unread by me, even after I made my more recent post on it in answer to the reported post. Since the mods didn't receive any further reports, I had assumed it had gotten better instead of worse. But honestly, a thread like that one is just asking for the limits to be pushed and the bounds over-stepped. What one person views as being perfectly normal when they look in a mirror may be seen as completely bizarre and offensive by another. Do I occasionally make jest of the appearance of others? Naturally...I'm human! And everyone has to admit that they have seen at least one other person whose appearance made them make some sort of comment.

I don't mean to say that the General Chit-Chat forum is the cause of the recent concerns. Yes, before that forum existed, it was more difficult to find a place for the more off-color comments. If I recall correctly, Chat ended up being the place for that sort of talk...and look what happened when things got out of hand there... I like the General Chit-Chat forum and would hate to see it go or get restricted. I would also hate to see the use of some implied profanity or mild sexual connotations be eliminated as well. I've used both, but I've also been offended when I think it has gone too far.

The problem is in trying to draw the line, defining what is and is not allowed. There is the extreme differences in each member's tolerance that is the root of the problem. A perfect example that Dean and I have personally dealt with is the use of a particular "s" word. I put it at the same level, or higher, than the "f" word, while Dean put it lower than the alternate "poop" word. The mods also have to acknowledge that our own individual tolerance levels and moods, as well as each member's tolerance level and mood, is going to vary from one day to the next. There are also all the misunderstood comments to deal with.

And right now, I want to sincerely apologize to any member that reported a post that they found was inappropriate or offensive, but that I "blew off" or replied to as being not that big of a deal. I never meant to make anyone feel that their feelings about something was not justified or valid. There are just times that each of us will have to accept and deal with the offending situation in our own way, even if all we can do is just get over it and move on. Dean, Mike and I are doing our best to keep this forum a place that everyone enjoys. However, if we don't use our own judgments or that of the general consensus, this forum will end up being worse than a recently released secret government document where all but every 26th word has been blacked out due to it's sensitive and still classified nature. Until I hear otherwise from Rich, I will continue to moderate this forum as I have been doing...viewing and deciding upon each individual case as it arises. It may seem at times that the moderators are not treating similar instances in the same manner, and that very well may be the case. But again, we're only human and have our varying tolerances and moods (and I don't even know if Dean and Mike are suffering from menopausal influences or not, but I know that I am) that can and do affect how we handle each situation from one day to the next.

It's already been mentioned, but I'll repeat it...If anyone has a concern about any post, thread or PM, notify the moderators by either reporting the post or sending us an e-mail. You may not get the response to the problem that you desire or feel is necessary, but your feelings will not be, nor have they ever been, dismissed or ignored.

And as a side note, if anyone has a particular problem with how another member posts, you always have the option of putting that member on your Ignore list so you will never have read their posts again.
 
Brava, Susan!!

To all the mods: please don't consider this thread as something wherein you've questioned YOUR moderating of the forums in general.

You're all doing great, and individually bringing your own "flavuh" to the forums, and I, for one, am grateful. And I'm not pulling an Eddie Haskell on ya here.

Zach has simply raised a point, and a legitimate one at that. Discussion has ensued as to how to make this a better place, IF anything needs to be done.

No harm, no foul. :shrugs:

And yes, there's always the ignore button.

regards,
jazz
 
Not flaming,just saying what I think.If you don't like what's in a thread don't read it.Just about all the "problem" threads are in general chit chat,it's not about snakes.

I don't think the problem is what you or I read or don't read. The OP brought this up because this is a family friendly forum, the concern is for what children might read and what children may perceive as acceptable.
 
If you've seen any of my posts, the last thing I am is an uptight prude. But to claim:



...is gonna be scrutinized by anyone who thinks critically.

First off, "sexy" is too subjective of an assessment that I doubt anyone could agree on. More importantly, to claim that "everyone" knows the intentions of the girls is really a stretch.

Since I lived in the town at the time, these generalizations reminded me of Judge Archie Simonson.

Never heard of him? Here you go. Take a look at the article date as well.

I don't mean to be on a soapbox here - but this is a claim waaaay to easy to refute.

regards,
jazz

Ok,I'm sorry. How's this...After much scientific discussion and calculation with a board of esteemed professors,we have come to the conclusion that 98.631% of the membership would agree as to why a woman would post a photo of herself in an article of clothing that reveals 1/3 of her breasts.
 
Ok,I'm sorry. How's this...After much scientific discussion and calculation with a board of esteemed professors,we have come to the conclusion that 98.631% of the membership would agree as to why a woman would post a photo of herself in an article of clothing that reveals 1/3 of her breasts.

Still to easy to refute, as you didn't cite the source of your research.

:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:

(And if she reveals 1/2 of her breasts, is she in essence revealing a full breast? Discuss.)

regards,
jazz
 
Ok,I'm sorry. How's this...After much scientific discussion and calculation with a board of esteemed professors,we have come to the conclusion that 98.631% of the membership would agree as to why a woman would post a photo of herself in an article of clothing that reveals 1/3 of her breasts.

I am a woman and I agree. If I posted a picture that showed off my cleavage and I didn't get any pervy comments, I'd be downright offended. I might even cry.
 
Still to easy to refute, as you didn't cite the source of your research.

:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:

(And if she reveals 1/2 of her breasts, is she in essence revealing a full breast? Discuss.)

regards,
jazz

For me, it would be much easier to accomplish any breast display by raising my shirt versus dropping the neckline. And to anybody that would actually look...THANKS! And exactly how long were you in prison?
 
Still to easy to refute, as you didn't cite the source of your research.

:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:

(And if she reveals 1/2 of her breasts, is she in essence revealing a full breast? Discuss.)

regards,
jazz

I'm sorry all my info and data on breasts has come from field research,you obviously rely on book work,while I prefer to be more "hands on" in this particular subject.:cheers:
 
And to anybody that would actually look...THANKS!

Reminds me of that time-honored joke of the 85 year old Jewish man who goes to confession at a Catholic church....

"Bless me father, for I have sinned. Last night, I had sex with a 18 year old woman."

"But you're Jewish....and I'm a priest....why are you telling me?"

"Hey, I'm 85. I'm telling everybody!"

:sidestep:

regards,
jazz
 
I'm sorry all my info and data on breasts has come from field research,you obviously rely on book work,while I prefer to be more "hands on" in this particular subject.:cheers:
I obviously rely on book work like you obviously know why women do things.

Face up to it. Be a man. We don't have a clue as to why women do things. :grin01:

regards,
jazz
 
I don't think the problem is what you or I read or don't read. The OP brought this up because this is a family friendly forum, the concern is for what children might read and what children may perceive as acceptable.

Good point,I guess it's hard for everyone to agree on what is exceptable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top