Kokopelli-
Answer this for me...When I sell a Ghost cornsnake, is it acceptable to siomply write "Ghost Corn", or do you feel that I should label it, "Ghost Corn: Double recessive genetics in a homozygous state"?
See...no one answered that question when I posed it earlier.
Here is the fact: A "Ghost Corn" is the accepted term for a cornsnake that is homozygous for hypo A and anery A, and is used ONLY for that description. NOBODY feels that any more label is necessary other than that.
Beginners don't know what a ghost corn is. Beginners can't tell it is not a normal based on the look. Beginners have no idea what a "ghost corn" is. Yet..."Ghost Corn" is the only label needed to accurately sell that animal.
Why is it any different for "Jungle Corn"? IMO, it shouldn't be. It is ONLY used for the description of a hybrid. It is used extensively as an appropriate trade name for a KNOWN hybrid.
Nobody cares whether or not a newbie knows what a "ghost corn" is. But all of a sudden...breeders are expected to take extra steps. extra precautions, and extra time to protect newbies from themselves?
I have pictures of corns labled as corns. I have pictures of kings labeled as kings. WHEN I have hybrids, they will be labled with the trade name, and grouped in the hybrids section.
Is it really MY responsibility to do any more than that? If someone asks, they get an honest and reliable answer. There really isn't much more I can do.
If someone sends me an email and says, "I'm interested in the Jungle Corn you have for sale. How much is shipping to....?" I am not going to send an email saying, "You know that a Jungle is a hybrid. It is 50% king and 50% corn. Because of this you shouldn't co-hab, and you shouldn't try to breed for corn morphs...etc,etc,etc..."
No...I'm going to send an email that says, "Shipping is $____. I accept PayPal, Postal MO, and personal checks."
The snake was sold ACCURATELY as a HYBRID. It was NOT mislabled, it was NOT misrepresented, and it was NOT sold as anything other than a hybrid.
Any confusion from that scenario is CLEARLY the fault of the buyer, NOT the seller.