• Hello!

    Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.

    Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....

    Please be certain that the location field is correctly filled out when you register. All registrations that appear to be bogus will be rejected. Which means that if your location field does NOT match the actual location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected.

    Sorry about the strictness of this requirement, but it is necessary to block spammers and scammers at the door as much as possible.

Random thought

How anyone can waste their time believing that crap is beyond me. As others have said in this thread, the God of Christian beliefs is a wanker. He's not worthy of being followed. He uses and abuses his "power" and his followers, and is more cruel than many other gods from mythology.

It is your passive aggressive quotes such as the one highlighted above that caused the upset with people who are generally 'live and let live' types.
I must admit that I am generally quite laid back and I probably found this quote to be one of the most offensive in the entire thread.
If you are specifically pointing towards extremists, then I can understand this, but it wasn't worded that way.

As I've posted earlier, I'm very scientifically oriented and evolution IS a fact - it's called adaptation. But there IS NO proof about our origination. It's all theory, belief and faith. And until we further progress in the realm of science, to the point where we KNOW (and not just speculate) how life was formed, it will remain so.
 
It is your passive aggressive quotes such as the one highlighted above that caused the upset with people who are generally 'live and let live' types.

I'm sorry... I'm not sure how that is passive aggressive. I do personally think that most of the Bible is a load of crap. It's anyones right to believe in it as they see fit, but do I not also have the right to say I think it's a load of crap? Again, why is it okay for one person to post biblical statements saying I am going to burn in Hell as a non-believer, but my statement of disbelief is not okay?

I do appreciate that. Hopefully you also appreciate the danger of blanket statements that can include some people you didn't mean to include. Later tonight when I have time I will make a post that will attempt to say one thing in two different ways as an example.

Despite some of the things I've read here I respect you all as intellegent people. I don't think the "hoops of semantics" are as hard as everyone is acting. I am sure you would expect those in the non-gay community to not make blanket statements about gays when they are really only disagreeing with the beliefs of one gay person. I don't think you would buy the "well you choose to put yourself in the equation" arguement.

You are right about that one statement-- it was a blanket statement, though it was not intended to be. It frustrates me to hear/see Christians in my life profess to support me, but not stand up to their religious leaders when they seek to pass laws that limit my own rights.
 
Is it REALLY that hard to address the OP and his specific views instead of mass bashing religion? Currently I believe most of you are intellegent enough to do this, and choose not to because either you don't care enought to put an extra 5 mintues thought into your wording, or believe I deserve less respect.

Personally, I far from agree with anything the OP has said. I probably came into this discussion with a different view point on his posting, since I read his previous posts prior to starting this one and it appears to me that he is just attempting to cause waves, so replying to him wasn't worth my time. Josh did a very good job, imo, originally responding to his verse quoting.
I have a feeling (and of course, this is only my opinion) that he is not quoting anything he actually 'believes in' but is just making semi inflammatory statements that will cause a reaction and/or debate.
 
I don't like how political religion it in this age and this country. So many people vote against their economic interests because they'd rather have someone of a particular faith in office. If this is the land of the free, then let it be so. Laws should protect rights not restrict them. Restrictions should be used to hold corporations in check and not bind individuals.
 
I just read another silly thread the OP made in which someone alleged that "a bunch" of long standing members were very upset over this thread.

I want to say that I really hope I did not upset anyone... certainly it was not my intention to do so. I have approached this as simply an interesting discussion... if it is not that way for others, please accept my apologies.
 
Still I do think there are overwhelmingly more facts supporting the theory of evolution than there are facts supporting the existence of an omnipotent being who created it all. So, evolution and the origin of life may be proved except for one or two pieces of the puzzle, I don't know of any piece of evidence regarding a deity who created this world and the universe and is still managing it somehow. To me that seems to be more of a way to fill in the gap we can't fill (yet) with science or our own reasoning. Show me some proofs of this deity and a heaven and such and I might chance my mind. And with proof I don't mean experiences like seeing a tunnel with a white light at the end or the appearance of an angel, since there is proof that people's brains are designed to make us understand the world around us so we can survive. Your brains fill in gaps if they have to, your own brain will fool you. I'm confident to say that I don't need to fill in this gap personally, since I can happily live without doing so.

Further I feel like stressing that I don't think believers are dumb or naive, I think distribution of intelligence is most probably the same among them as among non-believers. I only just cannot wrap my head around how intelligent people are capable of denying evolution whilst all there is to proof it, and choose to belief in a deity for who's existence exists no proof. Maybe those people are more intelligent than me and follow a logic and have a way of reasoning which are too complex for me to grasp...but sorry, I tend to not believe this. Maybe it's a flaw of me... I don't know, but my ability to go along with other peoples way of thinking stops right there.
 
I find some of the non-believer statements offensive. I also find some of the believer statements offensive.

God loves his "children". By right we are ALL his children. He may not like the things we DO, but he will never HATE us. I would also like to point out that "Fear" in many instances does not mean "be afraid of". It means, revere, respect, be in awe of.

My philosophy used to be, "I absolutely believe in God and I absolutely hate him." It took me a long time and is still taking time for me to put faith in him again. Sometimes I am not sure if he is real, but I find comfort in believing that someone is watching over me, protecting me. Sometimes when things get tough it is reassuring to know someone has my back, someone who will love me no matter what I do or where I go.

This is my God, perhaps he is like yours, perhaps for you he doesn't exist. That's YOUR choice and I respect it:

One night I dreamed I was walking along the beach with the Lord.
Many scenes from my life flashed across the sky.
In each scene I noticed footprints in the sand.
Sometimes there were two sets of footprints,
other times there were one set of footprints.

This bothered me because I noticed
that during the low periods of my life,
when I was suffering from
anguish, sorrow or defeat,
I could see only one set of footprints.

So I said to the Lord,
“You promised me Lord,
that if I followed you,
you would walk with me always.
But I have noticed that during the most trying periods of my life
there have only been one set of footprints in the sand.
Why, when I needed you most, you have not been there for me?”

The Lord replied,
“The times when you have seen only one set of footprints in the sand,
is when I carried you.”​
 
My perception was that the people of a non christian faith in reacting to the OP, posted up some stuff that would be hurtful to Christians, maybe a lot. I can understand why they did so but I think if we can learn not to use the R word, we could restrain ourselves a bit in posting images of crucified Alien Jesus, too. And I probably could have phrased "misogynistic bible thumping crap" better. I do feel as if some people may have hurt feelings here, but I could be wrong.
 
I do draw the line at religion interfering with "law of the land," and when I read this fellows original posts, I got the sense that he is the type of guy who supports the use of religion and religious beliefs in law making. And that is something that is not tolerable. His posts bring to mind the posts of other religious zealots I have dealt with, and I respond in kind. It was not I, nor Josh, nor Megan or anyone else who brought you and Carol into this discussion-- you all did that.

This is, again, an issue of semantics and if you are choosing to invite yourself into the same camp as the OP and be offended by my statements, then that is unfortunate, and regretable, for it was not my intent.
Here in bold is where I disagree with you, Lauren. In your post, you said that "The Christian God is a wanker..." THAT is where I felt that I had to respond. Sure that could very well be your opinion and I understand that the OP was very tactless in his posts and was very disrespectful to women as a whole. But you have to understand that your words there were what brought me into this discussion. Suppose my landlord was a pagan and offended me in some way (use your imagination). IF I came on here and went on a tirade that, in my opinion, my pagan landlord was a jerk, his religion is idiotic and stupid and that he and all pagans need to be electrocuted for daring to offend me - there would probably be an uproar and I'd be "crucified" for daring to lump all pagans together and belittling their religion. Suppose he had been a gay man and I had lumped all gay men together in the same fashion? I'd probably have been "BANNED" and burnt at the stake for it. Yet, it is perfectly okay for you to belittle my God and my religion? Not that I think my God needs defending, but I do have feelings too and it unsettles me that the expectation for "tolerance" for something seems to go one way, but not the other. One can speak all they'd like against "Christianity" but we have to act like we're stepping on eggshells when it comes to gays and lesbians, pagans (is this supposed to be capitalized? IDK.), Wiccans, and the myriad other perfectly legitimate belief systems/ways of life out there.

Now, I DO understand that there has been LOTS of stupid idiot "christian" folk who have painted HUGE targets on themselves (remember the "end of the world was supposed to be earlier this year - what a CROCK!), but that doesn't justify lumping ALL Christians together as bigots - because not all of us are... Just like you wouldn't want me to lump all (name a group) together, don't do the same to us. As many of us try to be sensitive to your issues and those of others, TRY to be sensitive to ours.

TBH, although the mods here (who are "practically perfect in every way..." LOL. I jest, but respect all their good work) would NOT approve, I would almost be "happier"/"more understanding" if the OP himself had been thrashed and lambasted rather than see many good people and their belief systems attacked and lumped in with him. However, I guess the "forum approved debate" should have centered on how unfounded his statements were and how hurtful they were to the good folks here. Difficult to do, but wouldn't it be better to go into a fight with pinpoint precision instead of with a shotgun, devil-may-care attitude.
 
Everyone should chill and go watch Dogma. My Mom is a devout Christian and she loved it. My husband belongs to the Church of the Sub-Genius and also loved it. It has some of the BEST takes on religion and I feel it universally touches them in a way that both sides can appreciate the movie.
 
GOODNESS! It took me so long to write my thoughts down that so much has happened. IF anything is "outdated" please forgive me.
 
Em Wright, I always loved that bit of writing (Footprints in the Sand). My mom has it framed on the wall in her house. Just because I don't worship the same way other folks do doesn't mean I am not comforted by knowing that something is there watching over us. It may not be scientific proof but there are way to many miracles that have happened and are happening through history to ignore.

I agree that people have needlessly been hurt by some of the posts in this thread and will offer this bit of advice one more time (so I don't beat the horse to death):

Step away from yourselves and your beliefs and take an objective look at your posts and the responses. This will help you understand the feelings of those you are responding to before you post. This works for both sides.

There, I said it again. :D
 
Last edited:
Religious debates always start out fun, but they can get real ugly real quick. Everyone should feel free to make of this life what they will, but not everyone is kind enough to so. To many people want power, simplicity, order, or their own way and decide to run down everyone who thinks differently.

I'm going to go paint some fairies, buy a package of rats, feed my beloved snakes and imagine where the magnetic bubbles in our solar system originated.
 
Oh my gosh!!! So much on one side of the fence to the other.

I have lots of reading to do here in between chores and other threads.

Still love you guys!! lol
 
Once again, I ask, how am I to express my distaste for the way in which I feel the OP has applied his faith to my life/afterlife without using descriptive terms that might impact unintended targets?!?

I suppose this baby-with-the-bathwater situation is why identifying yourself as something with which there are negative interpretations is not something I am willing to do. If portions of being anything, Christian, employed where I am, the people I am around, are things that I disagree with, I DISTANCE myself from them.

Instead of yelling at those of us without the descriptive terms to separate the various extremist and non-extremist versions of Christians among us, would any of us be so kind as to explore the scope of YOUR beliefs and how they differ from the op?

It's like identifying porn. You know what it is and isn't when you see it, but how to delineate without examples?

I hate seeing people I respect angry when we know they are on the other side of the line. If you want us to specifically say what we are arguing against, can you tell us what we are arguing FOR?
 
What was wrong with that?
That people who have done nothing wrong here would see it as a slight against something they strongly believe? IDK, I'll leave it to them to tell you if it bothered them, I could look at it and see that it was meant as a joke but was also be able to see how some might not find it that funny.
 
Here in bold is where I disagree with you, Lauren. In your post, you said that "The Christian God is a wanker..." THAT is where I felt that I had to respond. Sure that could very well be your opinion and I understand that the OP was very tactless in his posts and was very disrespectful to women as a whole. But you have to understand that your words there were what brought me into this discussion. Suppose my landlord was a pagan and offended me in some way (use your imagination). IF I came on here and went on a tirade that, in my opinion, my pagan landlord was a jerk, his religion is idiotic and stupid and that he and all pagans need to be electrocuted for daring to offend me - there would probably be an uproar and I'd be "crucified" for daring to lump all pagans together and belittling their religion. Suppose he had been a gay man and I had lumped all gay men together in the same fashion? I'd probably have been "BANNED" and burnt at the stake for it. Yet, it is perfectly okay for you to belittle my God and my religion? Not that I think my God needs defending, but I do have feelings too and it unsettles me that the expectation for "tolerance" for something seems to go one way, but not the other. One can speak all they'd like against "Christianity" but we have to act like we're stepping on eggshells when it comes to gays and lesbians, pagans (is this supposed to be capitalized? IDK.), Wiccans, and the myriad other perfectly legitimate belief systems/ways of life out there.

Now, I DO understand that there has been LOTS of stupid idiot "christian" folk who have painted HUGE targets on themselves (remember the "end of the world was supposed to be earlier this year - what a CROCK!), but that doesn't justify lumping ALL Christians together as bigots - because not all of us are... Just like you wouldn't want me to lump all (name a group) together, don't do the same to us. As many of us try to be sensitive to your issues and those of others, TRY to be sensitive to ours.

TBH, although the mods here (who are "practically perfect in every way..." LOL. I jest, but respect all their good work) would NOT approve, I would almost be "happier"/"more understanding" if the OP himself had been thrashed and lambasted rather than see many good people and their belief systems attacked and lumped in with him. However, I guess the "forum approved debate" should have centered on how unfounded his statements were and how hurtful they were to the good folks here. Difficult to do, but wouldn't it be better to go into a fight with pinpoint precision instead of with a shotgun, devil-may-care attitude.

Good post Fred.
I definitely agree. I get frustrated with people who try to force their religious beliefs on others, regardless of faith. I know that in any religion, there are those who follow their faith without inflicting their beliefs on others, & there are those that feel the need to either judge others who do not believe as they do.
Christianity is the one that affects me the most, because that is the most prominent religion. Knowing that Paganism was here in America long before Christianity, & when the Christian settlers came to this continent, they tried to convert Native Americans from their Pagan ways. When they couldn't change their ways, they took over their land, & gave them sections of land to live on (Reservations). They spread lies, about Paganism, so that other Christians would fear Paganism, claming they were devil worshipers, when in fact, it's merely a religion that honors nature, all her animals, all her plants, trees, etc.
I no longer celebrate St Patty's day, after learning the true meaning behind it. When St Patrick could not convert the Pagan Druids in Ireland, he ran them out, killed them. The stories tell of St Patrick running the "snakes" out of Ireland, when in fact it was the Pagan Druids that he "rid the area of".

*That said, I do NOT see all Christians in that light. I know that a good majority of Christians are not like that.
I respect Christianity & other religions.
I will not discount any religion, just because a handful of zealots make a bad name for that religion.

I will stand up when my religion is being attacked, but I feel the statements made by Lauren are just as offensive as the posts that the OP has made.

It is blatantly obvious that the OP is bent on preaching to us, by continuing to post scripture in more & more threads, answering questions with scripture.
I won't say he doesn't have the right to posting such things, but I do not want to see it.

We do have the option of blocking (with the "ignore" function) someone that we do not want to see. To me, it sounds like a pretty good option right now.
 
Last edited:
Faith...Evolution. It doesn't have to be either or. At least not in my mind! I resolved that issue when I was 10.
 
Back
Top