I would NEVER say that your statements have been held up by facts! In the place where this thread has strayed, it is pretty hard to use facts. Just opinions. and i would never call people with COMMON SENSE fring lunatics conspiracy theorists and liars. For instance the tea partys: those weren't fringe lunatics, just your common hard working americans. Just like the when over 1 million people marched up penn. ave to protest what there government was doing. They weren't conspiracy theorists, just regular people outraged at there government.
Dude, where are you on this? In my post to KJUN, I was referring to posts he made in other topics that were based on lies that conservatives started(the Obama speech), and conspiracy theories of illegal immigrants, indigents, and "lazy theives" getting free medical care on KJUN's dollar. The things that he was posting as support for his arguments were unfounded guesses made my conservative pundits and conspiracy theorists for the most part. The whole Obama Youth thread was started because of a bold faced lie made by a conservative pundit. THAT'S what I was talking about. I don't know what you're talking about...
Shwartz. is a rhino, and the way he is running that government, i think that he is nowhere near being "conservative".
I don't like the man either. What's your point? Doesn't matter what you think of him...he's still "labled" as a conservative republican...
Did he say that? NO. the people might not be dishonest, and most of them probably do not know what they are doing to the nation. They have good intentions. The orginizion is unamerican, yes. But not its workers that are on the low half of the totem pole. The head is the branch that knows what their doing.
Listen...implications are what they are. KJUN knows full well what his implications were when he mad that post. It was a distinct effort to immediately discount any different opinions as those of either dishonest individuals or unConstitutional individuals. There is no way to debate his post without immediately being labled as one or the other...or both. Period.
Ummmm,,,,, i don't know what world your living in if you thought that was meant as an INSULT towards the personnel of ACLU. I would say its an insult to the actions and head of the company. But its not personal.
Those aren't insults to the ACLU...they are direct insults to anyone posting a different opinion...me. I don't care about the ACLU, call them whatever you want. If I can get away wioth calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot, I certainly wouldn't fault you, KJUN, Brent or anyone else for calling any person fropm the ACLU the same or worse. It's an insult to me, and he knows it it will get my attention, and he knows I will post a different opinion. The entire point of the post is to insult anyone claiming otherwise.
Its pretty hard to hear sarcasm over the internet. Before now i don't recall you ever saying that you were being sarcastic.
Well, than you simply haven't been paying attention. I said it then, since, and now. I tell my roommate to kill himself all the time when he starts whining and acting like a baby.
To me...the very idea that anyone would take that seriously is ludicrous. Unless, of course, it was in a thread written by a depressed individul about the troubles and travails they are experiencing. Sure, if I wrote it then, I deserve to be permabanned and sent straight to hell. But context is a wonderful thing, and the context in which it was written was deliberately sarcastic. I'm not sorry I wrote it. I'm sorry people took it the wrong way, but it is what it is. Impossible to read vocal inflection over a forum.
He's not "twisting words." You said out loud that you wanted him to kill himself. Thats that.
See my reply above. It's called spin. And both KJUN and Brent are good at it. That's not an insult, it's a compliment. People make a ton of money for being able to do it. But taking words out of context and insisting they were intended in a manner that the context shows obviously was not the intention is called "twisting words". That's why I don't bother responding. Both Brent and KJUN are well aware of the intent of my use of those words. They just like trying to get me reiled up. Either that, or I am giving both of these guys WAY too much credit.
Going back to insults are we.... Or is it sarcasm again?
How is that an insult?
What about when that other "one" actually resigned?
He didn't complain. He quit. Big difference between getting fed up and walking away, and getting fed up and making a point of complaining about the job publicly everytime you have to do what you are actually supposed to do...and than continuing to do it.
THIS is worthless drivel. In THIS post you are twisting words to get your effect. THIS post is intended to make anger.
So what? Just as much as his posts are directly intended to make me angry, my replies are intended to do the same. It's called "poking the sleeping dog", and KJUN does it to me every chance he gets. Sometimes I poke back. It's a two way street, to be certain...
