Who's going to pay for DNA testing? The market's already saturared with the current non-certified Corns. Would buyers seriously pay another $200 on top for a DNA-confirmed Corn? That must be a very small and specialist market.
It's not like breeding is so lucrative that costs could be borne by the breeder.
What percentage of people buying a pet cornsnake even care about any of that, though? I would imagine the "serious breeders" are a very tiny percentage of all snake owners.
There's different lineages of ferrets, but not different breeds that are crossed. There's no crosses between a Black Footed Ferret, which is a cousin to the domestic ferret & would also be illegal."I'm not a big fan of purebreed anything. Sure they're pretty, but about all they're good for is a show. Every purebreed animal I've ever had has had some sort of genetic defect and ended up dying on me, or had to be euthanized. Purebreed to me = inbred. Everything I currently own is a mut and they're all the much healthier for it I believe; cats, dog, ferret, goats, bird, etc. So who's to say that by mixing in a smidgeon of a very very closely related (and maybe genetically identical) isn't bad to add new genes to the mix? I've seen what inbreeding peacocks can do, you end up with short-legged birds, birds with mental problems (yes it happens), and chicks that die days after hatching due to skeletal deformities. "Taceas
That's quite an assumption, on your part. Where's your information backing that musking & snake eating snakes are from other species?That is why we need a breeding standard that defines the standard traits of captive cornsnakes.
Is it just me that feels that angry, musking and snakeating snakes have got to much undesireble traits from other species?
It is time to leve the hybrid discussion behind. A true captive cornsnake is a cornsnake that fits the cornsnake breeding standard, independent of its origin.
What he said. Okeetees originated as a locality, & have been known to have mean temperments.There are a few members here that say w/c Okeetees are some of the meanest snakes around. :eatpointe
Between knowing reputable breeders, & the ACR, I see no need for DNA testing.No kidding. And really, I've never once been concerned that a reputable seller was offering me babies that weren't from the parents they were claiming.
This has been my experience.
They aren't the most prone to feeding response bites, but they are sure defensive for a while. Pretty much every locality Okeetee baby tail rattles, triangle heads, and bites and musks when picked up. They grow out of it with some handling, and probably even without it. But whereas 9 out of 10 "regular" corns are calm babies, maybe one out of ten early generation okeetees were for me. At any rate, I wouldn't dare suggest that defensive behavior is influenced by other species. I think a lot of it has just been bred out of captive lines.
If you have doubts that the baby is not what the breeder says it is, then maybe you need to find a different breeder.A paternity test only proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the parents are who one says they are. It eliminates the possibility of retained semen or parthenogenesis as being the culprit of one of the babies if used as a breeder and paternity tested. It also makes tracking of ones line, lineage, or pedigree beyond repute. If any foreign gene or even an undesired gene of corn origin is found, it enables one to quickly track the origin of that gene into the pool. Dna also helps to keep track or even find carriers of a heterozygous trait so as to make possible heterozygous specimens proven heterozygous specimens that can then be traced to other progeny to produce more known or suspected heterozygous specimens than might otherwise be uncovered. Dna also allows the sexing of snakes to enable one to more accurately determine sex. Dna testing eliminates immaculate misconceptions. As for Chips comment about breeding defensive behavior out of wild caught corns, I have no doubt that some breeders would not also like to select for the best behaved corns so to speak whether it is intentional or not.
Who's going to pay for DNA testing? The market's already saturared with the current non-certified Corns. Would buyers seriously pay another $200 on top for a DNA-confirmed Corn? That must be a very small and specialist market.
It's not like breeding is so lucrative that costs could be borne by the breeder.
Thats the beauty, your not going to have to charge $200 dollars for a dna confirmed corned. Your only going to have to pay for the paternity test for the parents or breeders if you will. If your 100% certain your breeding is as you say it is then the cost of getting the babies dna tested/proven will fall on the new owners if they choose to get their line proofed if you will back the parents. This can be done before or after purchase. If before purchase, then yes they are going to have to pay extra for that testing. If not, then as long as you keep your breeders and hold back breeders tested your line is secure. I've seen testing done for as low as 17 dollars. So even if you tested all of your snakes your only looking at charging a few dollars more and not 200 dollars more unless you have a particularly impressive pedigree dna proven and you think that warrants a markup.
Anyone concerned that hybrid dna was leaking into their pure gene pool or anyone that wanted to be 100% certain they were getting a boy or girl , snake would be interested I imagine. Those interested in being able to track heterzygous specimens back to their founding member would also be interested in such testing. Never mind those doing this would have a reputation above reproach as rumors are not stronger than dna testing.
A paternity test only proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the parents are who one says they are. It eliminates the possibility of retained semen or parthenogenesis as being the culprit of one of the babies if used as a breeder and paternity tested. It also makes tracking of ones line, lineage, or pedigree beyond repute. If any foreign gene or even an undesired gene of corn origin is found, it enables one to quickly track the origin of that gene into the pool. Dna also helps to keep track or even find carriers of a heterozygous trait so as to make possible heterozygous specimens proven heterozygous specimens that can then be traced to other progeny to produce more known or suspected heterozygous specimens than might otherwise be uncovered. Dna also allows the sexing of snakes to enable one to more accurately determine sex. Dna testing eliminates immaculate misconceptions. As for Chips comment about breeding defensive behavior out of wild caught corns, I have no doubt that some breeders would not also like to select for the best behaved corns so to speak whether it is intentional or not.
A paternity test and DNA sequencing designed to identify genetic species markers, are two entirely different things. I can imagine that a paternity test is quite cheap (although I'm not sure any court would accept the results of a $17 dollar test!) but the level of analysis which would identify non-Corn DNA in an alleged "pure" Corn (or prove the absence of it) would be far more involved and expensive.Thats the beauty, your not going to have to charge $200 dollars for a dna confirmed corned. Your only going to have to pay for the paternity test for the parents or breeders if you will. If your 100% certain your breeding is as you say it is then the cost of getting the babies dna tested/proven will fall on the new owners if they choose to get their line proofed if you will back the parents. This can be done before or after purchase. If before purchase, then yes they are going to have to pay extra for that testing. If not, then as long as you keep your breeders and hold back breeders tested your line is secure. I've seen testing done for as low as 17 dollars. So even if you tested all of your snakes your only looking at charging a few dollars more and not 200 dollars more unless you have a particularly impressive pedigree dna proven and you think that warrants a markup.
Quite simply, a dna test can establish beyond a reasonable doubt paternity and sex. Other than that, the rest is assuming the original snake were "pure" and as for how do you figure out possible hets or known hets using a dna pedigree.... it is as simple as following back a lineage that is dna proven to a common ancestor and observing that a, b, c, x, y, z greatgrandbabies all are proven to carry that trait. While perhaps that trait was not recognized in the parents or even the originators of the trait.
A paternity test will not tell you all of that.
It will take a significant amount of DNA testing with a good bit of money spent to establish that level of data.
Who on earth is going to be able to afford that?
Wish there was an edit feature, but there you go.
But why would that help? We're discussing the presence of hybrid genes in existing bloodlines. At some point, for your paternity test strategy to work, someone has to start with a pool of DNA-sequenced breeding Corns which can be proven hybrid-free. You can't just paternity test existing Corns. If they're carrying unknown hidden hybrid genes, then they'll be carried down to the offspring. The paternity test will just show that particular offspring came from two particular parents. If the parents haven't been proven hybrid-free by more detailed DNA testing, then the paternity test gets you nowhere.
But why would that help? We're discussing the presence of hybrid genes in existing bloodlines. At some point, for your paternity test strategy to work, someone has to start with a pool of DNA-sequenced breeding Corns which can be proven hybrid-free. You can't just paternity test existing Corns. If they're carrying unknown hidden hybrid genes, then they'll be carried down to the offspring. The paternity test will just show that particular offspring came from two particular parents. If the parents haven't been proven hybrid-free by more detailed DNA testing, then the paternity test gets you nowhere.
A picture of a coupling simply does not prove that another snakes retained semen is not the culprit of the baby or parthenogenesis for that matter.
How would it help? Simply put, it would not help unless an agreed upon standard was already in place. This means, already established lines would have to be grandfathered in bases on a general consensus that we trust those breeders and hope for that trust to be well deserved. Any new corn snakes found in the wild would then have to be vetted by experts and while nothing is perfect, thats a perfect a system as I can personally see and given the hoopla that I have seen and read repeatedly about suspect this or that... it could put an end to some or all of that ideally. But then who really knows what is pure anyways? Who is going to be the golden standard or set the golden standard?
This. Bisty is 100% correct.
A paternity test ONLY gives a confirmation of parentage. It does not tell you anything beyond that unless you pay for all the extra DNA work ups.
If designed to assure hybrid-free bloodlines, standards based on trust aren't worth the paper they're written on.How would it help? Simply put, it would not help unless an agreed upon standard was already in place. This means, already established lines would have to be grandfathered in bases on a general consensus that we trust those breeders and hope for that trust to be well deserved. Any new corn snakes found in the wild would then have to be vetted by experts and while nothing is perfect, thats a perfect a system as I can personally see and given the hoopla that I have seen and read repeatedly about suspect this or that... it could put an end to some or all of that ideally. But then who really knows what is pure anyways? Who is going to be the golden standard or set the golden standard?